These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14760965)

  • 1. The effect of accent evaluation and evidence on a suspect's perceived guilt and criminality.
    Dixon JA; Mahoney B
    J Soc Psychol; 2004 Feb; 144(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 14760965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring the diagnostic utility of facial composites: beliefs of guilt can bias perceived similarity between composite and suspect.
    Charman SD; Gregory AH; Carlucci M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):76-90. PubMed ID: 19309218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating investigators: how presentation order influences participant-investigators' interpretations of eyewitness identification and alibi evidence.
    Dahl LC; Brimacombe CA; Lindsay DS
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):368-80. PubMed ID: 18810615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When do we believe experts? The power of the unorthodox view.
    Alison L; Almond L; Christiansen P; Waring S; Power N; Villejoubert G
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(6):729-48. PubMed ID: 23042647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The presumption of guilt in suspect interrogations: Apprehension as a trigger of confirmation bias and debiasing techniques.
    Lidén M; Gräns M; Juslin P
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):336-354. PubMed ID: 29963877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Guilty by his fibers: suspect confession versus textile fibers reconstructed simulation.
    Suzuki S; Higashikawa Y; Sugita R; Suzuki Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Aug; 189(1-3):e27-32. PubMed ID: 19411148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age differences and schema effects in memory for crime information.
    Overman AA; Wiseman KD; Allison M; Stephens JD
    Exp Aging Res; 2013; 39(2):215-34. PubMed ID: 23421640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A cross-sectional study on expression of anger and factors associated with criminal recidivism in prisoners with prior offences.
    Corapçioğlu A; Erdoğan S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Mar; 140(2-3):167-74. PubMed ID: 15036438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The alias advantage and perceptions of guilt.
    MacLin OH; MacLin MK
    J Psychol; 2004 Jul; 138(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 15379010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How factors present during the immediate interrogation situation produce short-sighted confession decisions.
    Madon S; Yang Y; Smalarz L; Guyll M; Scherr KC
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Feb; 37(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 22924468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lie-detection biases among male police interrogators, prisoners, and laypersons.
    Elaad E
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 2):1047-56. PubMed ID: 20229908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders.
    Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of legal judgments for defendants with traumatic brain injury.
    St Pierre ME; Parente R
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2016 Jun; 39(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 27341367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: on the dangers of presuming guilt.
    Kassin SM; Goldstein CC; Savitsky K
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Apr; 27(2):187-203. PubMed ID: 12733421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating investigators: examining witnesses' influence on investigators.
    Dahl LC; Lindsay DS; Brimacombe CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Dec; 30(6):707-32. PubMed ID: 16741634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Narrative plausibility: the impact of sequence and anchoring.
    Canter DV; Grieve N; Nicol C; Benneworth K
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(2):251-67. PubMed ID: 12645048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The perfect match: Do criminal stereotypes bias forensic evidence analysis?
    Smalarz L; Madon S; Yang Y; Guyll M; Buck S
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Aug; 40(4):420-9. PubMed ID: 27149288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of context and state of guilt on the detection of concealed crime information.
    Elaad E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Mar; 71(3):225-34. PubMed ID: 18948149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New measures improve the accuracy of the directed-lie test when detecting deception using a mock crime.
    Bell BG; Kircher JC; Bernhardt PC
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Jun; 94(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 18343464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Criminal responsibility in schizophrenia with special attention to the mental state during the criminal act--a study based upon the activation-recurrence phenomenon].
    Higashi T
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2009; 111(7):762-88. PubMed ID: 19827562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.