These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14760978)
21. Selection of rural assistive technology using a HyperCard-based knowledge system. Freeman SA; Field WE Assist Technol; 1994; 6(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 10150739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assistive technology outcomes research: challenges met and yet unmet. Fuhrer MJ Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Jul; 80(7):528-35. PubMed ID: 11421522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sources of payment for assistive technology: findings from a national survey of persons with disabilities. Carlson D; Ehrlich N Assist Technol; 2006; 18(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 16796243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Technology assessment: scientific challenges. Royal HD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):503-7. PubMed ID: 8079834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cost collection and analysis for health economic evaluation. Smith KA; Rudmik L Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Aug; 149(2):192-9. PubMed ID: 23641023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cost effectiveness and efficiency in assistive technology service delivery. Warren CG Assist Technol; 1993; 5(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 10171980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Using assistive technology outcomes research to inform policy related to the employment of individuals with disabilities. Mendelsohn S; Edyburn DL; Rust KL; Schwanke TD; Smith RO Assist Technol; 2008; 20(3):139-48. PubMed ID: 18939654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Care to compare? Aston G Hosp Health Netw; 2008 Dec; 82(12):38-41, 1. PubMed ID: 19209502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reimbursement programs and health technology assessment for diabetes devices and supplies: a Canadian perspective. Cheung RY; Mui V J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 May; 9(3):706-10. PubMed ID: 25697719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A conceptual framework of outcomes for caregivers of assistive technology users. Demers L; Fuhrer MJ; Jutai J; Lenker J; Depa M; De Ruyter F Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Aug; 88(8):645-55; quiz 656-8, 691. PubMed ID: 19620830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Consequential validity of an assistive technology supplement for the School Function Assessment. Silverman MK; Smith RO Assist Technol; 2006; 18(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 17236474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Estimating costs in the economic evaluation of medical technologies. Luce BR; Elixhauser A Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1990; 6(1):57-75. PubMed ID: 2113891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of technology on costs and patient outcome. Ahrens T Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 1998 Mar; 10(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 9644353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluating outcomes in assistive technology: do we understand the commitment? DeRuyter F Assist Technol; 1995; 7(1):3-8; discussion 9-16. PubMed ID: 10150748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Early assessment of medical technologies to inform product development and market access: a review of methods and applications. Ijzerman MJ; Steuten LM Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2011 Sep; 9(5):331-47. PubMed ID: 21875163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Problems of using modelling in the economic evaluation of health care. Sheldon TA Health Econ; 1996; 5(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 8653188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]