143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1476105)
1. Treatment of Class II high angle malocclusions with the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric investigation.
Schiavoni R; Grenga V; Macri V
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Nov; 102(5):393-409. PubMed ID: 1476105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Treatment of Class II malocclusion using the Herbst appliance].
Schiavoni R
Mondo Ortod; 1990; 15(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 2402252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The acrylic-splint Herbst appliance: a cephalometric evaluation.
Windmiller EC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jul; 104(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 8322726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A cephalometric comparison of treatment with the Twin-block and stainless steel crown Herbst appliances followed by fixed appliance therapy.
Schaefer AT; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 15224053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
Pancherz H
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982; 15():189-96. PubMed ID: 6963773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cephalometric analysis of changes produced by a modified Herbst appliance in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
Sidhu MS; Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS
Br J Orthod; 1995 Feb; 22(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 7786859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Temporomandibular joint remodeling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: A prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric radiographic investigation.
Ruf S; Pancherz H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jun; 115(6):607-18. PubMed ID: 10358242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
Baysal A; Uysal T
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of splinted and banded Herbst appliances: treatment changes and complications.
Hägg U; Tse EL; Rabie AB; Robinson W
Aust Orthod J; 2002 Nov; 18(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 12462684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The integrated Herbst appliance--treatment effects in a group of adolescent males with Class II malocclusions compared with growth changes in an untreated control group.
Hägglund P; Segerdal S; Forsberg CM
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 18216374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The mechanism of Class II correction during Herbst therapy in relation to the vertical jaw base relationship: a cephalometric roentgenographic study.
Ruf S; Pancherz H
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 9267575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Dentaoalveolar changes in young adult patients with class II/1 malocclusion treated with the herbst appliance and an activator].
Nedeljković N; Sćepan I; Glisić B; Marković E
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2010 Feb; 67(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 20337101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of Herbst appliance treatment on the mandibular plane angle: a cephalometric roentgenographic study.
Ruf S; Pancherz H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Aug; 110(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 8760851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment and posttreatment effects of acrylic splint Herbst appliance therapy.
Franchi L; Baccetti T; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Apr; 115(4):429-38. PubMed ID: 10194289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Herbst appliance--its biologic effects and clinical use.
Pancherz H
Am J Orthod; 1985 Jan; 87(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 3855346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
