These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1476106)

  • 21. Clinical evaluations on thermal versus mechanical debonding of ceramic brackets.
    Kraut J; Radin S; Trowbridge HI; Emling RC; Yankell SL
    J Clin Dent; 1991; 2(4):92-6. PubMed ID: 1812905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does ultra-pulse CO(2) laser reduce the risk of enamel damage during debonding of ceramic brackets?
    Ahrari F; Heravi F; Fekrazad R; Farzanegan F; Nakhaei S
    Lasers Med Sci; 2012 May; 27(3):567-74. PubMed ID: 21667137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Electrothermal debracketing: patient acceptance and effects on the dental pulp.
    Dovgan JS; Walton RE; Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 7661140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The use of debonding pliers in the removal of ceramic brackets: force levels and enamel cracks.
    Bishara SE; Fonseca JM; Boyer DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 7661139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pulpal response in electrothermal debonding.
    Takla PM; Shivapuja PK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Dec; 108(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 7503040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study.
    Habibi M; Nik TH; Hooshmand T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):675-9. PubMed ID: 18005843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Laser-aided debonding of orthodontic ceramic brackets.
    Strobl K; Bahns TL; Willham L; Bishara SE; Stwalley WC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Feb; 101(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 1531397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket.
    Liu JK; Chung CH; Chang CY; Shieh DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):761-5; quiz 802. PubMed ID: 16360918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A post-treatment evaluation of multibonded ceramic brackets in orthodontics.
    Artun J
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Apr; 19(2):219-28. PubMed ID: 9183072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of the precrack preparation with an ultrasonic instrument on the ceramic bracket removal.
    Chen YL; Chen HY; Chiang YC; Chang HH; Lin CP
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2015 Aug; 114(8):704-9. PubMed ID: 23856344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Loss of surface enamel after bracket debonding: an in-vivo and ex-vivo evaluation.
    Pont HB; Özcan M; Bagis B; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Oct; 138(4):387.e1-387.e9. PubMed ID: 20889035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative evaluation of ceramic bracket base designs.
    Bordeaux JM; Moore RN; Bagby MD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jun; 105(6):552-60. PubMed ID: 8198079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Thermal image analysis of electrothermal debonding of ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
    Cummings M; Biagioni P; Lamey PJ; Burden DJ
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Apr; 21(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 10327734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements.
    Krell KV; Courey JM; Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 8456784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of adhesive resin flexibility on enamel fracture during metal bracket debonding: an ex vivo study.
    Kim YK; Park HS; Kim KH; Kwon TY
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 37(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 25548147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.
    Rix D; Foley TF; Mamandras A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11174538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ex vivo bond strength of adhesive precoated metallic and ceramic brackets.
    Bearn DR; Aird JC; McCabe JF
    Br J Orthod; 1995 Aug; 22(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 7577872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Torsional bond strength and failure pattern of ceramic brackets bonded to composite resin laminate veneers.
    Kao EC; Eliades T; Rezvan E; Johnston WM
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Dec; 17(6):533-40. PubMed ID: 8682171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bond strength of disinfected metal and ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
    Speer C; Zimny D; Hopfenmueller W; Holtgrave EA
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):836-42. PubMed ID: 16279832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Laser debonding of ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Tocchio RM; Williams PT; Mayer FJ; Standing KG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Feb; 103(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 8427220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.