These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1476106)
41. Assessment of enamel damage after removal of ceramic brackets. Kitahara-Céia FM; Mucha JN; Marques dos Santos PA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):548-55. PubMed ID: 18929273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparative study of dental enamel loss after debonding braces by analytical scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Rodríguez-Chávez JA; Arenas-Alatorre J; Belio-Reyes IA Microsc Res Tech; 2017 Jul; 80(7):680-686. PubMed ID: 28161895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Varlik SK; Ulusoy C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Particulate production during debonding of fixed appliances: Laboratory investigation and randomized clinical trial to assess the effect of using flash-free ceramic brackets. Vig P; Atack NE; Sandy JR; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):767-778. PubMed ID: 31153497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Enamel loss following ceramic bracket debonding: A quantitative analysis in vitro. Suliman SN; Trojan TM; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):651-6. PubMed ID: 25264580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Fabrication and evaluation of Bis-GMA/TEGDMA resin with various amounts of silane-coated silica for orthodontic use. Durrani OK; Bashir U; Arshad N Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 21292732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Ceramic bracket debonding by Tm:YAP laser irradiation. Dostalova T; Jelinkova H; Sulc J; Nemec M; Jelinek M; Fibrich M; Michalik P; Miyagi M; Seydlova M Photomed Laser Surg; 2011 Jul; 29(7):477-84. PubMed ID: 21332377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding. Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Adhesive performance of precoated brackets after expiration. Cloud CC; Trojan TM; Suliman SN; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A Angle Orthod; 2016 Mar; 86(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 26172317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Enamel damage from multiple debonding in the bracket adhesion technic]. Fischer-Brandies H; Monsees M Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1993 Aug; 54(4):143-7. PubMed ID: 8375784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The effect of enamel bleaching on the shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets. Oztaş E; Bağdelen G; Kiliçoğlu H; Ulukapi H; Aydin I Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 21262931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. In vitro comparison of debonding force and intrapulpal temperature changes during ceramic orthodontic bracket removal using a carbon dioxide laser. Ma T; Marangoni RD; Flint W Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Feb; 111(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 9057621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Microleakage under metallic and ceramic brackets bonded with orthodontic self-etching primer systems. Uysal T; Ulker M; Ramoglu SI; Ertas H Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1089-94. PubMed ID: 18947278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effect of self-etchant pH on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Ostby AW; Bishara SE; Denehy GE; Laffoon JF; Warren JJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 18675201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Failure mode analysis of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel. Eliades T; Viazis AD; Lekka M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jul; 104(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 8322720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effect of different resin removal methods on enamel after metal and ceramic bracket debonding : An in vitro micro-computed tomography study. Cesur E; Arslan C; Orhan AI; Bilecenoğlu B; Orhan K J Orofac Orthop; 2022 May; 83(3):157-171. PubMed ID: 34165586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Enamel surface roughness evaluation after bracket debonding: Comparison between light cure and self cure adhesive resin 3-Dimensional profilometric study. Chandrasekharan D; Sourabh C; Deenadayalan ; Praveen K Indian J Dent Res; 2022; 33(1):80-84. PubMed ID: 35946250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Bond strength of orthodontic brackets with new self-adhesive resin cements. Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 20362914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Easy Debonding of Ceramic Brackets Bonded with a Light-Cured Orthodontic Adhesive Containing Microcapsules with a CO Arima S; Namura Y; Tamura T; Shimizu N Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Mar; 36(3):162-168. PubMed ID: 29173028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study. Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]