BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14761925)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of gastric carcinoma staging: Japanese classification versus new american joint committee on cancer/international union against cancer classification.
    Kunisaki C; Shimada H; Nomura M; Matsuda G; Otsuka Y; Ono H; Akiyama H
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2004 Feb; 11(2):203-6. PubMed ID: 14761925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union against cancer classification of lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma in comparison with the Japanese classification.
    Ichikura T; Tomimatsu S; Uefuji K; Kimura M; Uchida T; Morita D; Mochizuki H
    Cancer; 1999 Aug; 86(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 10440681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system.
    Fujii K; Isozaki H; Okajima K; Nomura E; Niki M; Sako S; Izumi N; Mabuchi H; Nishiguchi K; Tanigawa N
    Br J Surg; 1999 May; 86(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 10361195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimum number of lymph nodes that should be examined for the International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification of gastric carcinoma.
    Ichikura T; Ogawa T; Chochi K; Kawabata T; Sugasawa H; Mochizuki H
    World J Surg; 2003 Mar; 27(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 12607061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of survival in gastric carcinoma related to lymph node grading by the new American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union International Contre le Cancer System or the Japanese system.
    Celen O; Yildirim E; Gülben K; Berberoğlu U
    Eur J Surg Suppl; 2003 Jul; (588):33-9. PubMed ID: 15200041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Superiority of a new UICC-TNM staging system for gastric carcinoma.
    Hayashi H; Ochiai T; Suzuki T; Shimada H; Hori S; Takeda A; Miyazawa Y
    Surgery; 2000 Feb; 127(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 10686976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the New International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma.
    Katai H; Yoshimura K; Maruyama K; Sasako M; Sano T
    Cancer; 2000 Apr; 88(8):1796-800. PubMed ID: 10760754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer: comparison of Union International Contra Cancer and Japanese systems.
    Ikeguchi M; Murakami D; Kanaji S; Ohro S; Maeta Y; Yamaguchi K; Tatebe S; Kondo A; Tsujitani S; Kaibara N
    ANZ J Surg; 2004 Oct; 74(10):852-4. PubMed ID: 15456431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and validation of a staging system for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer by the International Collaboration on Oropharyngeal cancer Network for Staging (ICON-S): a multicentre cohort study.
    O'Sullivan B; Huang SH; Su J; Garden AS; Sturgis EM; Dahlstrom K; Lee N; Riaz N; Pei X; Koyfman SA; Adelstein D; Burkey BB; Friborg J; Kristensen CA; Gothelf AB; Hoebers F; Kremer B; Speel EJ; Bowles DW; Raben D; Karam SD; Yu E; Xu W
    Lancet Oncol; 2016 Apr; 17(4):440-451. PubMed ID: 26936027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of staging between the old (6th edition) and new (7th edition) TNM classifications in advanced gastric cancer.
    Kikuchi S; Futawatari N; Sakuramoto S; Katada N; Yamashita K; Shibata T; Nemoto M; Watanabe M
    Anticancer Res; 2011 Jun; 31(6):2361-5. PubMed ID: 21737665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Classification of lymph node metastases from gastric cancer: comparison between N-site and N-number systems. Our experience and review of the literature.
    Aurello P; D'Angelo F; Rossi S; Bellagamba R; Cicchini C; Nigri G; Ercolani G; De Angelis R; Ramacciato G
    Am Surg; 2007 Apr; 73(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 17439029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prognostic value of lymph node staging in gastric cancer.
    Ichikawa D; Kurioka H; Ueshima Y; Shirono K; Kan K; Shioaki Y; Lee CJ; Hamashima T; Deguchi E; Ikeda E; Mutoh F; Yamagishi H
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(49):301-4. PubMed ID: 12630046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Classification of lymph node metastases from carcinoma of the stomach: comparison of the old (1987) and new (1997) TNM systems.
    de Manzoni G; Verlato G; Guglielmi A; Laterza E; Tomezzoli A; Pelosi G; Di Leo A; Cordiano C
    World J Surg; 1999 Jul; 23(7):664-9. PubMed ID: 10390583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of prognostic significance of nodal staging between old (4th edition) and new (5th edition) UICC TNM classification for gastric carcinoma. International Union Against Cancer.
    Yoo CH; Noh SH; Kim YI; Min JS
    World J Surg; 1999 May; 23(5):492-7; discussion 497-8. PubMed ID: 10085399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the staging of regional lymph nodes using the sixth and seventh editions of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system for the evaluation of overall survival in gastric cancer patients: findings of a case-control analysis involving a single institution in China.
    Deng J; Zhang R; Pan Y; Wang B; Wu L; Jiao X; Bao T; Hao X; Liang H
    Surgery; 2014 Jul; 156(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 24929759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lymph node status assessment for gastric carcinoma: is the number of metastatic lymph nodes really practical as a parameter for N categories in the TNM Classification? Tumor Node Metastasis.
    Kodera Y; Yamamura Y; Shimizu Y; Torii A; Hirai T; Yasui K; Morimoto T; Kato T; Kito T
    J Surg Oncol; 1998 Sep; 69(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 9762886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The rationality of N3 classification in the 7th edition of the International Union Against Cancer TNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinomas: a case-control study.
    Jun KH; Lee JS; Kim JH; Kim JJ; Chin HM; Park SM
    Int J Surg; 2014; 12(9):893-6. PubMed ID: 25026311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the prognostic significance between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and nodal stage in gastric carcinoma.
    Kato M; Saji S; Kawaguchi Y; Kunieda K; Sugiyama Y; Takagi Y; Hiraoka T; Kumazawa I; Adachi T
    Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(30):3281-6. PubMed ID: 10626202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical significance of the metastatic lymph-node ratio in early gastric cancer.
    Kunisaki C; Makino H; Akiyama H; Otsuka Y; Ono HA; Kosaka T; Takagawa R; Nagahori Y; Takahashi M; Kito F; Shimada H
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2008 Mar; 12(3):542-9. PubMed ID: 17851724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Classification of regional lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma. German Gastric Cancer Study Group.
    Roder JD; Böttcher K; Busch R; Wittekind C; Hermanek P; Siewert JR
    Cancer; 1998 Feb; 82(4):621-31. PubMed ID: 9477092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.