These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14762410)
21. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease. Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening. Ruamviboonsuk P; Teerasuwanajak K; Tiensuwan M; Yuttitham K; Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):826-32. PubMed ID: 16650679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An observational study to assess if automated diabetic retinopathy image assessment software can replace one or more steps of manual imaging grading and to determine their cost-effectiveness. Tufail A; Kapetanakis VV; Salas-Vega S; Egan C; Rudisill C; Owen CG; Lee A; Louw V; Anderson J; Liew G; Bolter L; Bailey C; Sadda S; Taylor P; Rudnicka AR Health Technol Assess; 2016 Dec; 20(92):1-72. PubMed ID: 27981917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Automated detection of diabetic retinopathy: results of a screening study. Bouhaimed M; Gibbins R; Owens D Diabetes Technol Ther; 2008 Apr; 10(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 18260777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparability of digital photography with the ETDRS film protocol for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy severity. Li HK; Danis RP; Hubbard LD; Florez-Arango JF; Esquivel A; Krupinski EA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 52(7):4717-25. PubMed ID: 21345979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. TOSCA-Imaging--developing Internet based image processing software for screening and diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Hejlesen O; Ege B; Englmeier KH; Aldington S; McCanna L; Bek T Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):222-6. PubMed ID: 15360807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal imaging for screening diabetic retinopathy. Lopez-Bastida J; Cabrera-Lopez F; Serrano-Aguilar P Diabet Med; 2007 Apr; 24(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 17298591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting. Uematsu T; Kasami M Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by ophthalmologists and endocrinologists with pupillary dilation and a nonmydriatic digital camera. Deb-Joardar N; Germain N; Thuret G; Manoli P; Garcin AF; Millot L; Gavet Y; Estour B; Gain P Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Nov; 140(5):814-821. PubMed ID: 16310458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal images in grading diabetic retinopathy. Saari JM; Summanen P; Kivelä T; Saari KM Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Apr; 82(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 15043527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of a computer-aided diagnosis system for diabetic retinopathy screening on public data. Sánchez CI; Niemeijer M; Dumitrescu AV; Suttorp-Schulten MS; Abràmoff MD; van Ginneken B Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 52(7):4866-71. PubMed ID: 21527381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Screening for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy: comparison of fundus photography with automated color contrast threshold test. Ong GL; Ripley LG; Newsom RS; Cooper M; Casswell AG Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 15013866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessing diabetic retinopathy using two-field digital photography and the influence of JPEG-compression. Stellingwerf C; Hardus PL; Hooymans JM Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 108(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 15573944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Digital fundus image grading with the non-mydriatic Visucam(PRO NM) versus the FF450(plus) camera in diabetic retinopathy. Neubauer AS; Rothschuh A; Ulbig MW; Blum M Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 17944975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Interobserver agreement between primary graders and an expert grader in the Bristol and Weston diabetic retinopathy screening programme: a quality assurance audit. Patra S; Gomm EM; Macipe M; Bailey C Diabet Med; 2009 Aug; 26(8):820-3. PubMed ID: 19709153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Nonmydriatic digital retinal images for determining diabetic retinopathy. Tanterdtham J; Singalavanija A; Namatra C; Trinavarat A; Rodanant N; Bamroongsuk P; Thoongsuwan S; Euasobhon W J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Mar; 90(3):508-12. PubMed ID: 17427528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Analysis of the diagnostic value of plasma endothelin for diabetic retinopathy using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Zhu H; Shi CH Ophthalmic Res; 2007; 39(5):289-93. PubMed ID: 17851270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]