BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14762938)

  • 1. Effects of end boundary conditions and specimen geometry on the viscoelastic properties of cancellous bone measured by dynamic mechanical analysis.
    Dong XN; Yeni YN; Les CM; Fyhrie DP
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Mar; 68(3):573-83. PubMed ID: 14762938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Elastic and viscoelastic properties of trabecular bone by a compression testing approach.
    Linde F
    Dan Med Bull; 1994 Apr; 41(2):119-38. PubMed ID: 8039429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of yield damage on the viscoelastic properties of cortical bone tissue as measured by dynamic mechanical analysis.
    Yeni YN; Shaffer RR; Baker KC; Dong XN; Grimm MJ; Les CM; Fyhrie DP
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Sep; 82(3):530-7. PubMed ID: 17295254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimizing specimen length in elastic testing of end-constrained cancellous bone.
    Lievers WB; Waldman SD; Pilkey AK
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2010 Jan; 3(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 19878899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of tissue preservation on murine bone mechanical properties.
    Nazarian A; Hermannsson BJ; Muller J; Zurakowski D; Snyder BD
    J Biomech; 2009 Jan; 42(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 19081098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Viscoelastic behaviour and failure of bovine cancellous bone under constant strain rate.
    Guedes RM; Simões JA; Morais JL
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 16271587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anatomical variation of human cancellous bone mechanical properties in vitro.
    Hobatho MC; Rho JY; Ashman RB
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 40():157-73. PubMed ID: 10168876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Precision of nanoindentation protocols for measurement of viscoelasticity in cortical and trabecular bone.
    Isaksson H; Nagao S; Małkiewicz M; Julkunen P; Nowak R; Jurvelin JS
    J Biomech; 2010 Aug; 43(12):2410-7. PubMed ID: 20478559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical behavior of human morselized cancellous bone in triaxial compression testing.
    Brodt MD; Swan CC; Brown TD
    J Orthop Res; 1998 Jan; 16(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 9565072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of collagen fiber orientation and other histocompositional characteristics on the mechanical properties of equine cortical bone.
    Skedros JG; Dayton MR; Sybrowsky CL; Bloebaum RD; Bachus KN
    J Exp Biol; 2006 Aug; 209(Pt 15):3025-42. PubMed ID: 16857886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fatigue damage in cancellous bone: an experimental approach from continuum to micro scale.
    Dendorfer S; Maier HJ; Hammer J
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2009 Jan; 2(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 19627813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The dependence between the strength and stiffness of cancellous and cortical bone tissue for tension and compression: extension of a unifying principle.
    Yeni YN; Dong XN; Fyhrie DP; Les CM
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 15299242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterization of the mechanical properties of demineralized bone.
    Summitt MC; Reisinger KD
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Dec; 67(3):742-50. PubMed ID: 14613221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A mechanical comparison of the locking compression plate (LCP) and the low contact-dynamic compression plate (DCP) in an osteoporotic bone model.
    Snow M; Thompson G; Turner PG
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 18349780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of a voxel-based FE method for prediction of the uniaxial apparent modulus of human trabecular bone using macroscopic mechanical tests and nanoindentation.
    Chevalier Y; Pahr D; Allmer H; Charlebois M; Zysset P
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(15):3333-40. PubMed ID: 17572433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Energy absorptive properties of human trabecular bone specimens during axial compression.
    Linde F; Hvid I; Pongsoipetch B
    J Orthop Res; 1989; 7(3):432-9. PubMed ID: 2703935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical evaluation of retrieved massive allografts: preliminary results.
    Wheeler DL; Haynie JL; Berrey H; Scarborough M; Enneking W
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2001; 37():251-6. PubMed ID: 11347398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The mechanobiology of cancellous bone structural adaptation.
    Jacobs CR
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2000; 37(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 10850827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic mechanical properties of silicone maxillofacial prosthetic materials and the influence of frequency and temperature on their properties.
    Murata H; Hong G; Hamada T; Polyzois GL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 12956490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.