These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14762975)
1. Lessons learned from "the skeptical environmentalist": an environmental health perspective. Bodnar A; Castorina R; Desai M; Duramad P; Fischer S; Klepeis N; Liang S; Mehta S; Naumoff K; Noth EM; Schei M; Tian L; Vork KL; Smith KR Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2004 Jan; 207(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 14762975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How ethics shape the policy preferences of environmental scientists: What we can learn from Lomborg and his critics. Balint PJ Politics Life Sci; 2003 Mar; 22(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 16859357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientific conduct. Charges don't stick to The Skeptical Environmentalist. Frank L Science; 2004 Jan; 303(5654):28. PubMed ID: 14704405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Policy and science in children's health and environment: recommendations from the PINCHE project. van den Hazel P; Zuurbier M; Bistrup ML; Busby C; Fucic A; Koppe JG; Lundqvist C; Ronchetti R; ten Tusscher G Acta Paediatr Suppl; 2006 Oct; 95(453):114-9. PubMed ID: 17000578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The attitudes of religious, environmental, and science policy leaders toward biotechnology. Miller JD Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1985 Dec; 8(4):141-64. PubMed ID: 4095277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e955-77. PubMed ID: 16618790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality science and quality assurance: observations of an environmental scientist. Hughes TJ Qual Assur; 1999; 7(4):225-35. PubMed ID: 11191123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conflicts of interest in medical science: peer usage, peer review and 'CoI consultancy'. Charlton BG Med Hypotheses; 2004; 63(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 15236772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Science, politics, and peer review. An editor's dilemma. McCarty R Am Psychol; 2002 Mar; 57(3):198-201. PubMed ID: 11905119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Great Lakes Center's health hazard evaluation program: promoting community environmental health through partnerships between academic and public health departments. Cali S; Scheff P; Mucha A; Nickels L; Oliynyk I; Hryhorczuk D J Environ Health; 2007; 70(1):42-6, 63. PubMed ID: 17802816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stretched peer-review on unexpected results (GMOs). Myhr AI Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):99-106. PubMed ID: 16304941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Naturally occurring asbestos: a recurring public policy challenge. Lee RJ; Strohmeier BR; Bunker KL; Van Orden DR J Hazard Mater; 2008 May; 153(1-2):1-21. PubMed ID: 18180100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The science and intricacy of environmental safety evaluations. Käppeli O; Auberson L Trends Biotechnol; 1997 Sep; 15(9):342-9. PubMed ID: 9293032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Books on health policy and health reform: how is nursing represented? Mundt MH J Prof Nurs; 1997; 13(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9183109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]