145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14763192)
21. Clinicopathologic study of fallopian tube closure after single transcervical insertion of quinacrine pellets.
Merchant RN; Prabhu SR; Kessel E
Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1995; 40(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 7749435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The acceptability, efficacy and safety of quinacrine non-surgical sterilization (QS), tubectomy and vasectomy in 5 provinces in the Red River Delta, Vietnam: a follow-up of 15,190 cases.
Hieu DT; Luong TT; Anh PT; Ngoc DH; Duong LQ
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Oct; 83 Suppl 2():S77-85. PubMed ID: 14763190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quinacrine sterilization (QS): time for reconsideration.
Lippes J
Contraception; 2015 Aug; 92(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 26072742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Late tubal patency following tubal ligation.
Grunert GM
Fertil Steril; 1981 Apr; 35(4):406-8. PubMed ID: 7215564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Hysteroscopic Sterilization Device Follow-Up Rate: Hysterosalpingogram Versus Transvaginal Ultrasound.
Jeirath N; Basinski CM; Hammond MA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):836-841. PubMed ID: 29289623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quinacrine sterilization of 1997 women in Daharpur, Midnapore, West Bengal, India: a comparison of 3 protocols.
Pal SK
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Oct; 83 Suppl 2():S97-100. PubMed ID: 14763193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fallopian tubal patency diagnosed by magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography.
Ma L; Wu G; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Wang J; Li L; Zhou W
J Reprod Med; 2012; 57(9-10):435-40. PubMed ID: 23091993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of special training for quinacrine sterilization (QS) in Faisalabad, Pakistan: a report on an 1833-women subset of 11,000 cases.
Bashir A; Bashir M; Afzal S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Oct; 83 Suppl 2():S67-71. PubMed ID: 14763188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of the FemTest device pre- and post-sterilization.
Guzmán-Serani R; Rosa G
Contraception; 1989 Jul; 40(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 2776464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinico-pathological study of fallopian tubes after transcervical insertion of quinacrine hydrochloride pellets.
Merchant RN; Doctor VM; Thaku SS; Sinha M; Jhaveri CL; Kessel E; Mumford SD
Adv Contracept; 1986 Mar; 2(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 3776739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Analysis of 1006 cases with selective salpingography and fallopian tube recanalization].
Li QY; Zhou XL; Qin HP; Liu R
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 39(2):80-2. PubMed ID: 15059580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Female sterilization using chemical agents.
Richart RM
Res Front Fertil Regul; 1981 Dec; 1(5):1-12. PubMed ID: 12179630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Four-year clinical evaluation of quinacrine pellets for non-surgical female sterilization.
Suhadi A; Anwar M; Soejoenoes A
Adv Contracept; 1998 Mar; 14(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 9587010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Can hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography replace hysterosalpingography in confirming tubal blockage after hysteroscopic sterilization and in the evaluation of the uterus and tubes in infertile patients?
Luciano DE; Exacoustos C; Johns DA; Luciano AA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 204(1):79.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21187197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of quinacrine sterilization (QS) and surgical sterilization (TL) in 600 women in Guizhou Province, China.
Lu W; Zhu J; Zhong C; Zhao Y
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Dec; 83 Suppl 2():S51-S58. PubMed ID: 29645214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sonographic recognition of three cases of septate uteri diminishes failures of quinacrine sterilization.
Ferreira CR; Magalhaes DR; Lippes J
Contraception; 2006 Apr; 73(4):433-6. PubMed ID: 16531181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quinacrine sterilization: a retrospective.
Zipper J; Kessel E
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Oct; 83 Suppl 2():S7-11. PubMed ID: 14763180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The assessment of endometrial pathology and tubal patency: a comparison between the use of ultrasonography and X-ray hysterosalpingography for the investigation of infertility patients.
Strandell A; Bourne T; Bergh C; Granberg S; Asztely M; Thorburn J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 14(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 10550881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Tubal patency during the menstrual cycle and during treatment with hormonal contraceptives: a pilot study in women.
Jensen JT; Patil E; Seguin J; Thurmond A
Acta Radiol; 2017 Aug; 58(8):1020-1025. PubMed ID: 27856803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Comparison of assessing the patency of the Fallopian tubes during laparoscopy and during hysterosalpingography on television in infertile women with endometriosis].
Salata I; Gottwald L; Sobkiewicz S
Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):1014-7. PubMed ID: 14674161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
