These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14763217)

  • 21. Measurement of subtle auditory deficit in tinnitus patients with normal audiometric thresholds using evoked otoacoustic emissions and threshold equalizing noise tests.
    Ishak WS; Zhao F; Rajenderkumar D; Arif M
    Int Tinnitus J; 2013; 18(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 24995898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Middle ear and cochlear disorders result in different DPOAE growth behaviour: implications for the differentiation of sound conductive and cochlear hearing loss.
    Gehr DD; Janssen T; Michaelis CE; Deingruber K; Lamm K
    Hear Res; 2004 Jul; 193(1-2):9-19. PubMed ID: 15219315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Otoacoustic emissions and effects of contralateral white noise stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in diabetic children.
    Ugur AK; Kemaloglu YK; Ugur MB; Gunduz B; Saridogan C; Yesilkaya E; Bideci A; Cinaz P; Goksu N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 73(4):555-9. PubMed ID: 19150138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electrocochleography is more sensitive than distortion-product otoacoustic emission test for detecting noise-induced temporary threshold shift.
    Kim JS; Nam EC; Park SI
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Oct; 133(4):619-24. PubMed ID: 16213939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Otoacoustic emissions growth rate threshold: distortion product in neonates.
    Almeida PP; Sanches SG; Carvallo RM
    Pro Fono; 2010; 22(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 21271091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Elevation of auditory thresholds by spontaneous cochlear oscillations.
    Powers NL; Salvi RJ; Wang J; Spongr V; Qiu CX
    Nature; 1995 Jun; 375(6532):585-7. PubMed ID: 7791874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of middle ear effusion on distortion product otoacoustic emission.
    Tas A; Yagiz R; Uzun C; Adali MK; Koten M; Tas M; Karasalihoglu AR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Apr; 68(4):437-40. PubMed ID: 15013610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
    Purcell DW; Butler BE; Saunders TJ; Allen P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of the acoustic and neural distortion product at 2f1-f2 in normal-hearing adults.
    Elsisy H; Krishnan A
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jul; 47(7):431-8. PubMed ID: 18574781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice.
    Varghese GI; Zhu X; Frisina RD
    Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of exercise and noise on auditory thresholds and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Hooks-Horton S; Geer S; Stuart A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Jan; 12(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 11214978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions using continuously sweeping primaries.
    Long GR; Talmadge CL; Lee J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1613-26. PubMed ID: 19045653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Fitzgerald TS; Prieve BA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Analysis of the distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and input/output function (I/O) in tinnitus patient with normal hearing].
    Bartnik G; Rogowski M; Fabijańska A; Raj-Koziak D; Borawska B
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2004; 58(6):1127-32. PubMed ID: 15732834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of drilling on the distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the non-operated ear.
    Migirov L; Wolf M
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 19451738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in an industrial setting.
    Korres GS; Balatsouras DG; Tzagaroulakis A; Kandiloros D; Ferekidou E; Korres S
    Noise Health; 2009; 11(43):103-10. PubMed ID: 19414930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of glucocorticoid receptor antagonist on CAPs threshold shift due to short-term sound exposure in guinea pigs.
    Mori T; Fujimura K; Yoshida M; Suzuki H
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2004 Dec; 31(4):395-9. PubMed ID: 15571913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Otoacoustic detection of risk of early hearing loss in ears with normal audiograms: a 3-year follow-up study.
    Job A; Raynal M; Kossowski M; Studler M; Ghernaouti C; Baffioni-Venturi A; Roux A; Darolles C; Guelorget A
    Hear Res; 2009 May; 251(1-2):10-6. PubMed ID: 19249340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Applying distortion product otoacoustic emission in testing human sensory hearing loss].
    Chen X; Zheng H; Zheng Y
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 May; 35(3):382-4. PubMed ID: 15181843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.