BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14763537)

  • 1. Current overview of neurovascular structures in hip arthroplasty: anatomy, preoperative evaluation, approaches, and operative techniques to avoid complications.
    Rue JP; Inoue N; Mont MA
    Orthopedics; 2004 Jan; 27(1):73-81; quiz 82-3. PubMed ID: 14763537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Blood vessel and nerve damage in total hip arthroplasty].
    Dietze S; Perka C; Baecker H
    Orthopade; 2014 Jan; 43(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 24384891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neurovascular structure proximity to acetabular retractors in total hip arthroplasty.
    Shubert D; Madoff S; Milillo R; Nandi S
    J Arthroplasty; 2015 Jan; 30(1):145-8. PubMed ID: 25263247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anterior acetabular retractors and the femoral neurovascular bundle in anterior total hip arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.
    Stubbs T; Moon AS; Dahlgren N; Patel HA; Jha AJ; Shah A; Naranje SM
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2020 May; 30(4):617-620. PubMed ID: 31863272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distal Extension of the Direct Anterior Approach to the Hip: A Cadaveric Feasibility Study.
    Ghijselings SG; Driesen R; Simon JP; Corten K
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):300-303. PubMed ID: 27515242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safe Zones for Anterior Acetabular Retractor Placement in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Cadaveric Study.
    Sullivan CW; Banerjee S; Desai K; Smith M; Roberts JT
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2019 Nov; 27(21):e969-e976. PubMed ID: 30676517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neurovascular injury: avoiding catastrophe.
    Barrack RL
    J Arthroplasty; 2004 Jun; 19(4 Suppl 1):104-7. PubMed ID: 15190562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The course of the inferior gluteal nerve in the posterior approach to the hip.
    Ling ZX; Kumar VP
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Dec; 88(12):1580-3. PubMed ID: 17159167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Total hip arthroplasty: the mini-posterior approach.
    Ginnetti JG; Erickson J; Peters CL
    Instr Course Lect; 2013; 62():237-43. PubMed ID: 23395029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neurovascular Injury in Hip Arthroplasty.
    Yang IH
    Hip Pelvis; 2014 Jun; 26(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 27536562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Not all hip arthroplasties are created equal: increased complications and re-admissions after total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures compared with osteoarthritis.
    Charette RS; Sloan M; Lee GC
    Bone Joint J; 2019 Jun; 101-B(6_Supple_B):84-90. PubMed ID: 31146554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Posterolateral minimal incision for total hip replacement: technique and early results.
    Hartzband MA
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 35(2):119-29. PubMed ID: 15062697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anterolateral muscle sparing approach total hip arthroplasty: an anatomic and clinical study.
    Zhang XL; Shen H; Qin XL; Wang Q
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Aug; 121(15):1358-63. PubMed ID: 18959109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distances between bony landmarks and adjacent nerves: anatomical factors that may influence retractor placement in total hip replacement surgery.
    Wang TI; Chen HY; Tsai CH; Hsu HC; Lin TL
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Mar; 11():31. PubMed ID: 26984637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does Surgical Approach Affect Patient-reported Function After Primary THA?
    Graves SC; Dropkin BM; Keeney BJ; Lurie JD; Tomek IM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Apr; 474(4):971-81. PubMed ID: 26620966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective comparative study of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients-a minimum of five year follow-up.
    Tao R; Liu F; Liu YK; Lu Y; Xu H; Cao Y; Zhou ZY; Wang W
    Int Orthop; 2018 Oct; 42(10):2323-2327. PubMed ID: 29455347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acetabular anatomy and transacetabular screw fixation at the high hip center.
    Wasielewski RC; Galat DD; Sheridan KC; Rubash HE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Sep; 438():171-6. PubMed ID: 16131887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complications of the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty.
    Barton C; Kim PR
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2009 Jul; 40(3):371-5. PubMed ID: 19576405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is the Anterior Approach Safe? Early Complication Rate Associated With 5090 Consecutive Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Procedures Performed Using the Anterior Approach.
    Barnett SL; Peters DJ; Hamilton WG; Ziran NM; Gorab RS; Matta JM
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2291-4. PubMed ID: 26897487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty: Can leg length be satisfactorily controlled via anterior approach without a traction table? Evaluation in 56 patients with EOS 3D.
    Lecoanet P; Vargas M; Pallaro J; Thelen T; Ribes C; Fabre T
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Dec; 104(8):1143-1148. PubMed ID: 30314938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.