These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14764123)

  • 1. A low incidence of positive surgical margins in prostate cancer at high risk of extracapsular extension after a modified anterograde radical prostatectomy.
    Serni S; Masieri L; Lapini A; Nesi G; Carini M
    BJU Int; 2004 Feb; 93(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 14764123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
    Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stage T1-2 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy.
    Kupelian PA; Katcher J; Levin HS; Klein EA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(5):1043-52. PubMed ID: 9169811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostate-specific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Klein E
    Urology; 1996 Aug; 48(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 8753737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Positive surgical margins with radical retropubic prostatectomy: anatomic site-specific pathologic analysis and impact on prognosis.
    Obek C; Sadek S; Lai S; Civantos F; Rubinowicz D; Soloway MS
    Urology; 1999 Oct; 54(4):682-8. PubMed ID: 10510928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Eastham JA; Kattan MW; Riedel E; Begg CB; Wheeler TM; Gerigk C; Gonen M; Reuter V; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2003 Dec; 170(6 Pt 1):2292-5. PubMed ID: 14634399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy.
    Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Martin SK; Amling CL; Zincke H
    Urology; 1997 Nov; 50(5):733-9. PubMed ID: 9372884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Initial dissection of the lateral fascia reduces the positive margin rate in radical prostatectomy.
    Klein EA; Kupelian PA; Tuason L; Levin HS
    Urology; 1998 May; 51(5):766-73. PubMed ID: 9610590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
    Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
    Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should a positive surgical margin following radical prostatectomy be pathological stage T2 or T3? Results from the SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ; Aronson W; Presti JC; Kane CJ; Terris MK; Elashoff D; Amling CL;
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2142-6. PubMed ID: 12771736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy at a single institution: preoperative and pathologic factors, and the impact of surgeon variability and technique on incidence and location.
    Lallas CD; Fashola Y; Den RB; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F; Calvaresi AE; McCue P; Birbe R; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ
    Can J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(5):7479-86. PubMed ID: 25347375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
    Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer.
    Huang JG; Pedersen J; Hong MK; Harewood LM; Peters J; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 23350712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Salomon L; Anastasiadis AG; Levrel O; Katz R; Saint F; de la Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
    Urology; 2003 Feb; 61(2):386-90. PubMed ID: 12597953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biochemical recurrence rates are similar for pT2-positive surgical margins and pT3a.
    Leite KR; Hartmann C; Reis ST; Viana N; Dall'Oglio MF; Sant'Anna AC; Nesrallah A; Nesrallah L; Antunes AA; Camara-Lopes LH; Srougi M
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 24856481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nondissection of pelvic lymph nodes does not influence the results of perineal radical prostatectomy in selected patients.
    Salomon L; Hoznek A; Lefrère-Belda MA; Bellot J; Chopin DK; Abbou CC
    Eur Urol; 2000 Mar; 37(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 10720855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of risk factors associated with prostate cancer extension to the surgical margin and pelvic node metastasis at radical prostatectomy.
    Ackerman DA; Barry JM; Wicklund RA; Olson N; Lowe BA
    J Urol; 1993 Dec; 150(6):1845-50. PubMed ID: 7693981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of extent of surgical margin positivity on prostate specific antigen recurrence.
    Emerson RE; Koch MO; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Juliar BE; Cheng L
    J Clin Pathol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):1028-32. PubMed ID: 16189146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.