182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14764139)
21. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Yuri P; Hariwibowo R; Soeroharjo I; Danarto R; Hendri AZ; Brodjonegoro SR; Rasyid N; Birowo P; Widyahening IS
Acta Med Indones; 2018 Jan; 50(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 29686172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Lower pole caliceal stone clearance after ESWL: the effect of infundibulopelvic angle.
Lojanapiwat B; Soonthornpun S; Wudhikarn S
J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Sep; 82(9):891-4. PubMed ID: 10561945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line monotherapy of solitary calyceal calculi.
Andreassen KH; Dahl C; Andersen JT; Rasmussen MS; Jacobsen JD; Mogensen P
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1997 Jun; 31(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 9249886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower calyx stones: predicting treatment success.
Mata Alcaraz M; Laso García I; Mínguez Ojeda C; Artiles Medina A; Duque Ruiz G; Hevia Palacios M; Arias Fúnez F; Burgos Revilla FJ
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2023 Dec; 47(10):688-693. PubMed ID: 37442226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Lower calyceal and renal pelvic stones in preschool children: A comparative study of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.
ElSheemy MS; Daw K; Habib E; Aboulela W; Fathy H; Shouman AM; El Ghoneimy M; Shoukry AI; Morsi HA; Badawy H
Int J Urol; 2016 Jul; 23(7):564-70. PubMed ID: 27173126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Renal Stone Features Are More Important Than Renal Anatomy to Predict Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes: Results from a Prospective Study with CT Follow-Up.
Torricelli FCM; Monga M; Yamauchi FI; Marchini GS; Danilovic A; Vicentini FC; Batagello CA; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
J Endourol; 2020 Jan; 34(1):63-67. PubMed ID: 31595801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Management of calyceal diverticular stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy: long-term outcome.
Turna B; Raza A; Moussa S; Smith G; Tolley DA
BJU Int; 2007 Jul; 100(1):151-6. PubMed ID: 17552962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of stones in lower calices of kidney].
Martov AG; Peniukova IV; Moskalenko SA; Peniukov VG; Peniukov DV; Balykov IS
Urologiia; 2013; (3):10-7. PubMed ID: 23987042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Is lower pole caliceal anatomy predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success for primary lower pole kidney stones?
Sorensen CM; Chandhoke PS
J Urol; 2002 Dec; 168(6):2377-82; discussion 2382. PubMed ID: 12441921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of the effects of relationships between main spatial lower pole calyceal anatomic factors on the success of shock-wave lithotripsy in patients with lower pole kidney stones.
Sahinkanat T; Ekerbicer H; Onal B; Tansu N; Resim S; Citgez S; Oner A
Urology; 2008 May; 71(5):801-5. PubMed ID: 18279941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of lower pole renal anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy: fact or fiction?
Madbouly K; Sheir KZ; Elsobky E
J Urol; 2001 May; 165(5):1415-8. PubMed ID: 11342888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of renal anatomy on shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for lower pole kidney stones: results of a prospective multifactorial analysis controlled by computerized tomography.
Torricelli FC; Marchini GS; Yamauchi FI; Danilovic A; Vicentini FC; Srougi M; Monga M; Mazzucchi E
J Urol; 2015 Jun; 193(6):2002-7. PubMed ID: 25524240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower caliceal stones in children compared with stones in other renal locations.
Demirkesen O; Onal B; Tansu N; Altintaş R; Yalçin V; Oner A
Urology; 2006 Jan; 67(1):170-4; discussion 174-5. PubMed ID: 16413356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radiographic anatomical factors do not predict clearance of lower caliceal calculus by shock-wave lithotripsy.
Viswaroop B; Devasia A; Gnanaraj L; Chacko N; Kekre N; Gopalakrishnan G
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2005; 39(3):226-9. PubMed ID: 16118095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Shock wave lithotripsy success for renal stones based on patient and stone computed tomography characteristics.
Weld KJ; Montiglio C; Morris MS; Bush AC; Cespedes RD
Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1043-6; discussion 1046-7. PubMed ID: 18158009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The impact of radiological anatomy in clearance of lower caliceal stones after shock wave lithotripsy.
Ozgür Tan M; Irkilata L; Sen I; Onaran M; Küpeli B; Karaoğlan U; Bozkirli I
Urol Res; 2007 Jun; 35(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 17447057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi.
Gupta NP; Ansari MS; Kesarvani P; Kapoor A; Mukhopadhyay S
BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1285-8. PubMed ID: 15892818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prediction of success rate after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal stones--a multivariate analysis model.
Abdel-Khalek M; Sheir KZ; Mokhtar AA; Eraky I; Kenawy M; Bazeed M
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2004; 38(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 15204407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Predictive factors of successful treatment of lower caliceal calculi with Edap LT02 extracorporeal lithotripsy].
Nouri M; Tligui M; Haab F; Flahaut A; Gattegno B; Thibault P
Prog Urol; 2000 Sep; 10(4):529-36. PubMed ID: 11064892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
