These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14765602)

  • 1. Weighted specific-category kappa measure of interobserver agreement.
    Kvålseth TO
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Dec; 93(3 Pt 2):1283-90. PubMed ID: 14765602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinicians are right not to like Cohen's κ.
    de Vet HC; Mokkink LB; Terwee CB; Hoekstra OS; Knol DL
    BMJ; 2013 Apr; 346():f2125. PubMed ID: 23585065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Alternative Interpretation of the Linearly Weighted Kappa Coefficients for Ordinal Data.
    Kvålseth TO
    Psychometrika; 2018 May; ():. PubMed ID: 29766350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The exact variance of weighted kappa with multiple raters.
    Mielke PW; Berry KJ; Johnston JE
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Oct; 101(2):655-60. PubMed ID: 18175509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An implicit enumeration method for an exact test of weighted kappa.
    Brusco MJ; Stahl S; Steinley D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):439-52. PubMed ID: 17650363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Analyzing interrater agreement for categorical data using Cohen's kappa and alternative coefficients].
    Wirtz M; Kutschmann M
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2007 Dec; 46(6):370-7. PubMed ID: 18188809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Graphical aids for visualizing and interpreting patterns in departures from agreement in ordinal categorical observer agreement data.
    Bangdiwala SI
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(5):773-783. PubMed ID: 28010186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inter- and intraobserver agreement on the Load Sharing Classification of thoracolumbar spine fractures.
    Elzinga M; Segers M; Siebenga J; Heilbron E; de Lange-de Klerk ES; Bakker F
    Injury; 2012 Apr; 43(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 21645896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interobserver agreement: Cohen's kappa coefficient does not necessarily reflect the percentage of patients with congruent classifications.
    Steinijans VW; Diletti E; Bömches B; Greis C; Solleder P
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1997 Mar; 35(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 9088995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing observer agreement when describing and classifying functioning with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.
    Grill E; Mansmann U; Cieza A; Stucki G
    J Rehabil Med; 2007 Jan; 39(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 17225041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chance-corrected measures for 2 × 2 tables that coincide with weighted kappa.
    Warrens MJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):355-65. PubMed ID: 21492138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the inter-rater agreement for ordinal data through weighted indexes.
    Marasini D; Quatto P; Ripamonti E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2611-2633. PubMed ID: 24740999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hubert's multi-rater kappa revisited.
    Martín Andrés A; Álvarez Hernández M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 31056757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A unified approach for assessing agreement for continuous and categorical data.
    Lin L; Hedayat AS; Wu W
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):629-52. PubMed ID: 17613645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the effects of rater and subject factors on measures of association.
    Nelson KP; Mitani AA; Edwards D
    Biom J; 2018 May; 60(3):639-656. PubMed ID: 29349801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Turning subjective into objective: the BCCT.core software for evaluation of cosmetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment.
    Cardoso MJ; Cardoso J; Amaral N; Azevedo I; Barreau L; Bernardo M; Christie D; Costa S; Fitzal F; Fougo JL; Johansen J; Macmillan D; Mano MP; Regolo L; Rosa J; Teixeira L; Vrieling C
    Breast; 2007 Oct; 16(5):456-61. PubMed ID: 17606373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS): interobserver agreement of a new grading system to assess glaucomatous optic disc damage.
    Bochmann F; Howell JP; Meier C; Becht C; Thiel MA
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2009 Apr; 226(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 19384783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) in practice: agreement between observers rating esophageal varices: how to cope with chance?
    Sierra F; Cárdenas A
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Nov; 102(11):2363-6. PubMed ID: 17958753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sequentially Determined Measures of Interobserver Agreement (Kappa) in Clinical Trials May Vary Independent of Changes in Observer Performance.
    Reeve R; Gottlieb K
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2020 May; 54(3):681-686. PubMed ID: 33301153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the reliability of ordered categorical scales using kappa-type statistics.
    Roberts C; McNamee R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2005 Oct; 14(5):493-514. PubMed ID: 16248350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.