These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14765602)

  • 21. Evaluation of videoendoscopic examinations of arytenoid function in the 2-year-old Thoroughbred: Can we all agree?
    McLellan J; Plevin S
    Equine Vet J; 2019 May; 51(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 30281841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of a lameness scoring system for dairy cows.
    Thomsen PT; Munksgaard L; Tøgersen FA
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Jan; 91(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 18096932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Measures of agreement between many raters for ordinal classifications.
    Nelson KP; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2015 Oct; 34(23):3116-32. PubMed ID: 26095449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
    Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
    Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Indexing systematic rater agreement with a latent-class model.
    Schuster C; Smith DA
    Psychol Methods; 2002 Sep; 7(3):384-95. PubMed ID: 12243308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Kappa Paradox Explained.
    Derksen BM; Bruinsma W; Goslings JC; Schep NWL
    J Hand Surg Am; 2024 May; 49(5):482-485. PubMed ID: 38372689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Interobserver agreement in detecting goitre by palpation in a school population].
    González-González A; Muñoz-Serrano A; Tenías-Burillo JM; Falero-Gallego P; García-Fuentes E; Gutierrez-Repiso C; Cañete R
    An Pediatr (Barc); 2013 Sep; 79(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 23428758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. MR reproducibility in the assessment of uterine fibroids for patients scheduled for uterine artery embolization.
    Volkers NA; Hehenkamp WJ; Spijkerboer AM; Moolhuijzen AD; Birnie E; Ankum WM; Reekers JA
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2008; 31(2):260-8. PubMed ID: 18057985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How subjective is nasal endoscopy? A study of interrater agreement using the Lund and Mackay scoring system.
    Annamalai S; Davis J; Kubba H
    Am J Rhinol; 2004; 18(5):301-3. PubMed ID: 15586801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sputum cytology within and across laboratories. A reliability study.
    Holiday DB; McLarty JW; Farley ML; Mabry LC; Cozens D; Roby T; Waldron E; Underwood RD; Anderson E; Culbreth W
    Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(2):195-206. PubMed ID: 7887067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Exact and resampling probability values for weighted kappa.
    Berry KJ; Johnston JE; Mielke PW
    Psychol Rep; 2005 Apr; 96(2):243-52. PubMed ID: 15941094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Can the modified functional independence measure be reliably obtained from the patient medical record by different raters?
    Gabbe BJ; Sutherland AM; Wolfe R; Williamson OD; Cameron PA
    J Trauma; 2007 Dec; 63(6):1374-9. PubMed ID: 18212664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quality assessment of ordinal scale reproducibility: log-linear models provided useful information on scale structure.
    Valet F; Guinot C; Ezzedine K; Mary JY
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):983-90. PubMed ID: 18502608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Comparative analysis of three approaches for rater agreement].
    Ato M; Benavente A; López JJ
    Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):638-45. PubMed ID: 17296098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Appearance scales to measure cosmetic outcomes of healed lacerations.
    Quinn JV; Drzewiecki AE; Stiell IG; Elmslie TJ
    Am J Emerg Med; 1995 Mar; 13(2):229-31. PubMed ID: 7893315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Measures of interrater agreement.
    Mandrekar JN
    J Thorac Oncol; 2011 Jan; 6(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 21178713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Statistical methods for assessing agreement for ordinal data.
    Jakobsson U; Westergren A
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2005 Dec; 19(4):427-31. PubMed ID: 16324069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in pH-impedance analysis between 10 experts and automated analysis.
    Loots CM; van Wijk MP; Blondeau K; Dalby K; Peeters L; Rosen R; Salvatore S; Wenzl TG; Vandenplas Y; Benninga MA; Omari TI
    J Pediatr; 2012 Mar; 160(3):441-446.e1. PubMed ID: 21924738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Glandular cell atypia on Papanicolaou smears: interobserver variability in the diagnosis and prediction of cell of origin.
    Simsir A; Hwang S; Cangiarella J; Elgert P; Levine P; Sheffield MV; Roberson J; Talley L; Chhieng DC
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 14681938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Effect of the Raters' Marginal Distributions on Their Matched Agreement: A Rescaling Framework for Interpreting Kappa.
    Karelitz TM; Budescu DV
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2013 Nov; 48(6):923-52. PubMed ID: 26745599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.