586 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14766127)
1. The value of FDG-PET in the detection, grading and response to therapy of soft tissue and bone sarcomas; a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bastiaannet E; Groen H; Jager PL; Cobben DC; van der Graaf WT; Vaalburg W; Hoekstra HJ
Cancer Treat Rev; 2004 Feb; 30(1):83-101. PubMed ID: 14766127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Primary Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas by 18F-FDG-PET.
Younis MH; Abu-Hijleh HA; Aldahamsheh OO; Abualruz A; Thalib L
Med Princ Pract; 2020; 29(5):465-472. PubMed ID: 31887730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging in the evaluation of sarcomas: A systematic review.
Lim HJ; Johnny Ong CA; Tan JW; Ching Teo MC
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2019 Nov; 143():1-13. PubMed ID: 31449981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual-time point 18FDG-PET/CT imaging may be useful in assessing local recurrent disease in high grade bone and soft tissue sarcoma.
Dancheva Z; Bochev P; Chaushev B; Yordanova T; Klisarova A
Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2016; 19(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 26841376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of FDG PET/CT in Patient Management and Outcome of Skeletal and Soft Tissue Sarcomas.
Sheikhbahaei S; Marcus C; Hafezi-Nejad N; Taghipour M; Subramaniam RM
PET Clin; 2015 Jul; 10(3):375-93. PubMed ID: 26099673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical value of [18-F]] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in soft tissue sarcomas.
Schwarzbach MH; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Willeke F; Hinz U; Strauss LG; Zhang YM; Mechtersheimer G; Attigah N; Lehnert T; Herfarth C
Ann Surg; 2000 Mar; 231(3):380-6. PubMed ID: 10714631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic significance of (18)F-FDG PET at diagnosis in patients with soft tissue sarcoma and bone sarcoma; systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kubo T; Furuta T; Johan MP; Ochi M
Eur J Cancer; 2016 May; 58():104-11. PubMed ID: 26990930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation of soft tissue and bone sarcomas from benign lesions utilizing
Chen B; Feng H; Xie J; Li C; Zhang Y; Wang S
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Jul; 20(1):85. PubMed ID: 32711449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Positron emission tomography (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and prognosis in patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma: A meta-analysis.
Li YJ; Dai YL; Cheng YS; Zhang WB; Tu CQ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1103-14. PubMed ID: 27189833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic PET 18F-FDG studies in patients with primary and recurrent soft-tissue sarcomas: impact on diagnosis and correlation with grading.
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Strauss LG; Schwarzbach M; Burger C; Heichel T; Willeke F; Mechtersheimer G; Lehnert T
J Nucl Med; 2001 May; 42(5):713-20. PubMed ID: 11337565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Necrosis on FDG PET/CT correlates with prognosis and mortality in sarcomas.
Rakheja R; Makis W; Tulbah R; Skamene S; Holcroft C; Nahal A; Turcotte R; Hickeson M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jul; 201(1):170-7. PubMed ID: 23789672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sarcoma tumor FDG uptake measured by PET and patient outcome: a retrospective analysis.
Eary JF; O'Sullivan F; Powitan Y; Chandhury KR; Vernon C; Bruckner JD; Conrad EU
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Sep; 29(9):1149-54. PubMed ID: 12192559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of several FDG PET parameters for prediction of soft tissue tumour grade at primary diagnosis and recurrence.
Fendler WP; Chalkidis RP; Ilhan H; Knösel T; Herrmann K; Issels RD; Bartenstein P; Cyran CC; Lindner LH; Hacker M
Eur Radiol; 2015 Aug; 25(8):2214-21. PubMed ID: 25693667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic value of
Kassem TW; Abdelaziz O; Emad-Eldin S
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Oct; 98(10):693-698. PubMed ID: 28734778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The clinical efficacy of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in benign and malignant musculoskeletal tumors.
Shin DS; Shon OJ; Han DS; Choi JH; Chun KA; Cho IH
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Aug; 22(7):603-9. PubMed ID: 18756363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative, dynamic 18F-FDG-PET for the evaluation of soft tissue sarcomas: relation to differential diagnosis, tumor grading and prediction of prognosis.
Okazumi S; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Schwarzbach MH; Strauss LG
Hell J Nucl Med; 2009; 12(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 19936332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monitoring of neoadjuvant therapy response of soft-tissue and musculoskeletal sarcoma using fluorine-18-FDG PET.
Jones DN; McCowage GB; Sostman HD; Brizel DM; Layfield L; Charles HC; Dewhirst MW; Prescott DM; Friedman HS; Harrelson JM; Scully SP; Coleman RE
J Nucl Med; 1996 Sep; 37(9):1438-44. PubMed ID: 8790188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone versus soft-tissue sarcomas in the elderly.
Torigoe T; Terakado A; Suehara Y; Kurosawa H; Yazawa Y; Takagi T
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2010 Apr; 18(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 20427836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FDG PET/CT imaging in primary osseous and soft tissue sarcomas: a retrospective review of 212 cases.
Charest M; Hickeson M; Lisbona R; Novales-Diaz JA; Derbekyan V; Turcotte RE
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2009 Dec; 36(12):1944-51. PubMed ID: 19593561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of FDG positron emission tomography in conjunction with MR imaging for evaluating therapy response in patients with musculoskeletal sarcomas.
Bredella MA; Caputo GR; Steinbach LS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Nov; 179(5):1145-50. PubMed ID: 12388489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
