118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14766389)
1. Statistical methods for detecting genomic alterations through array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).
Wang Y; Guo SW
Front Biosci; 2004 Jan; 9():540-9. PubMed ID: 14766389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of chromosomal abnormalities by comparative genomic hybridization.
Lapierre JM; Tachdjian G
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 17(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 15758611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.
Pinkel D; Segraves R; Sudar D; Clark S; Poole I; Kowbel D; Collins C; Kuo WL; Chen C; Zhai Y; Dairkee SH; Ljung BM; Gray JW; Albertson DG
Nat Genet; 1998 Oct; 20(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 9771718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays.
Pollack JR; Perou CM; Alizadeh AA; Eisen MB; Pergamenschikov A; Williams CF; Jeffrey SS; Botstein D; Brown PO
Nat Genet; 1999 Sep; 23(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 10471496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer.
Kloth JN; Oosting J; van Wezel T; Szuhai K; Knijnenburg J; Gorter A; Kenter GG; Fleuren GJ; Jordanova ES
BMC Genomics; 2007 Feb; 8():53. PubMed ID: 17311676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization to clinical diagnostics.
Bejjani BA; Shaffer LG
J Mol Diagn; 2006 Nov; 8(5):528-33. PubMed ID: 17065418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Across array comparative genomic hybridization: a strategy to reduce reference channel hybridizations.
Buffart TE; Israeli D; Tijssen M; Vosse SJ; Mrsić A; Meijer GA; Ylstra B
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2008 Nov; 47(11):994-1004. PubMed ID: 18663753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A statistical approach for array CGH data analysis.
Picard F; Robin S; Lavielle M; Vaisse C; Daudin JJ
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():27. PubMed ID: 15705208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization.
du Manoir S; Speicher MR; Joos S; Schröck E; Popp S; Döhner H; Kovacs G; Robert-Nicoud M; Lichter P; Cremer T
Hum Genet; 1993 Feb; 90(6):590-610. PubMed ID: 8444465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Denoising array-based comparative genomic hybridization data using wavelets.
Hsu L; Self SG; Grove D; Randolph T; Wang K; Delrow JJ; Loo L; Porter P
Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):211-26. PubMed ID: 15772101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization and its applications in human genetics.
Oostlander AE; Meijer GA; Ylstra B
Clin Genet; 2004 Dec; 66(6):488-95. PubMed ID: 15521975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization as a tool for analyzing the leukemia genome.
Strefford JC; Parker H
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 538():151-77. PubMed ID: 19277573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CGHPRO -- a comprehensive data analysis tool for array CGH.
Chen W; Erdogan F; Ropers HH; Lenzner S; Ullmann R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():85. PubMed ID: 15807904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Construction and application of a full-coverage, high-resolution, human chromosome 8q genomic microarray for comparative genomic hybridization.
van Duin M; van Marion R; Watson JE; Paris PL; Lapuk A; Brown N; Oseroff VV; Albertson DG; Pinkel D; de Jong P; Nacheva EP; Dinjens W; van Dekken H; Collins C
Cytometry A; 2005; 63(1):10-9. PubMed ID: 15619731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative genomic hybridization.
Pinkel D; Albertson DG
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2005; 6():331-54. PubMed ID: 16124865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A method for calling gains and losses in array CGH data.
Wang P; Kim Y; Pollack J; Narasimhan B; Tibshirani R
Biostatistics; 2005 Jan; 6(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 15618527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnosis of copy number variation by Illumina next generation sequencing is comparable in performance to oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridisation.
Hayes JL; Tzika A; Thygesen H; Berri S; Wood HM; Hewitt S; Pendlebury M; Coates A; Willoughby L; Watson CM; Rabbitts P; Roberts P; Taylor GR
Genomics; 2013 Sep; 102(3):174-81. PubMed ID: 23598253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current status and future prospects of array-based comparative genomic hybridisation.
Snijders AM; Pinkel D; Albertson DG
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic; 2003 Apr; 2(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 15239942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SeeGH--a software tool for visualization of whole genome array comparative genomic hybridization data.
Chi B; DeLeeuw RJ; Coe BP; MacAulay C; Lam WL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Feb; 5():13. PubMed ID: 15040819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors.
Kallioniemi OP; Kallioniemi A; Piper J; Isola J; Waldman FM; Gray JW; Pinkel D
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1994 Aug; 10(4):231-43. PubMed ID: 7522536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
