These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14766492)

  • 1. Development of prehension between 5 and 10 years of age: distance scaling, grip aperture, and sight of the hand.
    Smyth MM; Katamba J; Peacock KA
    J Mot Behav; 2004 Mar; 36(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 14766492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of sight of the hand in the development of prehension in childhood.
    Smyth MM; Peacock KA; Katamba J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Feb; 57(2):269-96. PubMed ID: 14742177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the reach-to-grasp movement between children and adults: a kinematic study.
    Zoia S; Pezzetta E; Blason L; Scabar A; Carrozzi M; Bulgheroni M; Castiello U
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2006; 30(2):719-38. PubMed ID: 16995833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual information and the control of reaching in children: a comparison between children with and without developmental coordination disorder.
    Smyth MM; Anderson HI; Churchill AC
    J Mot Behav; 2001 Sep; 33(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 11495835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of forward models for hand localization and movement control in 6- to 10-year-old children.
    Contreras-Vidal JL
    Hum Mov Sci; 2006 Oct; 25(4-5):634-45. PubMed ID: 17011659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coupling of the reach and grasp phase during catching in children with developmental coordination disorder.
    Astill S; Utley A
    J Mot Behav; 2008 Jul; 40(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 18628108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developmental changes in the response to obstacles during prehension.
    Tresilian JR; Mon-Williams M; Coppard VL; Carson RG
    J Mot Behav; 2005 Mar; 37(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 15730944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reaching and grasping with restricted peripheral vision.
    González-Alvarez C; Subramanian A; Pardhan S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 17470239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prehension movements directed to approaching objects: influence of stimulus velocity on the transport and the grasp components.
    Chieffi S; Fogassi L; Gallese V; Gentilucci M
    Neuropsychologia; 1992 Oct; 30(10):877-97. PubMed ID: 1436435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Developmental features of rapid aiming arm movements across the lifespan.
    Yan JH; Thomas JR; Stelmach GE; Thomas KT
    J Mot Behav; 2000 Jun; 32(2):121-40. PubMed ID: 11005944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do obstacles affect the selection of grasping points?
    Voudouris D; Smeets JB; Brenner E
    Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Oct; 31(5):1090-102. PubMed ID: 22698834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grasping deficits and adaptations in adults with stereo vision losses.
    Melmoth DR; Finlay AL; Morgan MJ; Grant S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Aug; 50(8):3711-20. PubMed ID: 19339741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceived reachability for self and for others by 3- to 5-year-old children and adults.
    Rochat P
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1995 Apr; 59(2):317-33. PubMed ID: 7722438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of increased complexity of visuo-motor transformations on children's arm movements.
    Bo J; Contreras-Vidal JL; Kagerer FA; Clark JE
    Hum Mov Sci; 2006 Oct; 25(4-5):553-67. PubMed ID: 17011657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utilization of visual feedback of the hand according to target view availability in the online control of prehension movements.
    Fukui T; Inui T
    Hum Mov Sci; 2013 Aug; 32(4):580-95. PubMed ID: 24054896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of viewing the moving limb and target object during the early phase of movement on the online control of grasping.
    Fukui T; Inui T
    Hum Mov Sci; 2006 Jun; 25(3):349-71. PubMed ID: 16707178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal-spatial parameters of the upper limb during a Reach & Grasp Cycle for children.
    Butler EE; Ladd AL; Lamont LE; Rose J
    Gait Posture; 2010 Jul; 32(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 20558067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the relation between object shape and grasping kinematics.
    Cuijpers RH; Smeets JB; Brenner E
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 91(6):2598-606. PubMed ID: 14749319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Grip control in children before, during, and after impulsive loading.
    Bleyenheuft Y; Thonnard JL
    J Mot Behav; 2010; 42(3):169-77. PubMed ID: 20418219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Braking reaching movements: a test of the constant tau-dot strategy under different viewing conditions.
    Hopkins B; Churchill A; Vogt S; Rönnqvist L
    J Mot Behav; 2004 Mar; 36(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 14766484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.