These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14766828)

  • 1. Direct amplification and genotyping of Dientamoeba fragilis from human stool specimens.
    Peek R; Reedeker FR; van Gool T
    J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Feb; 42(2):631-5. PubMed ID: 14766828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of Dientamoeba fragilis in fresh stool specimens using PCR.
    Stark D; Beebe N; Marriott D; Ellis J; Harkness J
    Int J Parasitol; 2005 Jan; 35(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 15619516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of three diagnostic methods, including real-time PCR, for detection of Dientamoeba fragilis in stool specimens.
    Stark D; Beebe N; Marriott D; Ellis J; Harkness J
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Jan; 44(1):232-5. PubMed ID: 16390978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The importance of being Dientamoeba fragilis].
    Lacasella V; Brandonisio O; Capolongo C; Marangi M; Giangaspero A
    Infez Med; 2013 Mar; 21(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 23524895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic diversity of Dientamoeba fragilis isolates of irritable bowel syndrome patients by high-resolution melting-curve (HRM) analysis.
    Hussein EM; Al-Mohammed HI; Hussein AM
    Parasitol Res; 2009 Oct; 105(4):1053-60. PubMed ID: 19543748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison and Recommendations for Use of Dientamoeba fragilis Real-Time PCR Assays.
    Gough R; Ellis J; Stark D
    J Clin Microbiol; 2019 May; 57(5):. PubMed ID: 30814263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of microscopy, two xenic culture techniques, conventional and real-time PCR for the detection of Dientamoeba fragilis in clinical stool samples.
    Stark D; Barratt J; Roberts T; Marriott D; Harkness J; Ellis J
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2010 Apr; 29(4):411-6. PubMed ID: 20155433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Real-time PCR for the detection of Dientamoeba fragilis in fecal samples.
    Verweij JJ; Mulder B; Poell B; van Middelkoop D; Brienen EA; van Lieshout L
    Mol Cell Probes; 2007; 21(5-6):400-4. PubMed ID: 17587544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intragenomic variation in the internal transcribed spacer 1 region of Dientamoeba fragilis as a molecular epidemiological marker.
    Bart A; van der Heijden HM; Greve S; Speijer D; Landman WJ; van Gool T
    J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Oct; 46(10):3270-5. PubMed ID: 18650356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multilocus sequence typing of Dientamoeba fragilis identified a major clone with widespread geographical distribution.
    Cacciò SM; Sannella AR; Bruno A; Stensvold CR; David EB; Guimarães S; Manuali E; Magistrali C; Mahdad K; Beaman M; Maserati R; Tosini F; Pozio E
    Int J Parasitol; 2016 Nov; 46(12):793-798. PubMed ID: 27555056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection and transmission of Dientamoeba fragilis from environmental and household samples.
    Stark D; Roberts T; Marriott D; Harkness J; Ellis JT
    Am J Trop Med Hyg; 2012 Feb; 86(2):233-6. PubMed ID: 22302854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dientamoeba fragilis DNA detection in Enterobius vermicularis eggs.
    Ögren J; Dienus O; Löfgren S; Iveroth P; Matussek A
    Pathog Dis; 2013 Nov; 69(2):157-8. PubMed ID: 23893951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of Dientamoeba fragilis among diarrheal patients referred to Tabriz health care centers by nested PCR.
    Sarafraz S; Farajnia S; Jamali J; Khodabakhsh F; Khanipour F
    Trop Biomed; 2013 Mar; 30(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 23665716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blastocystis hominis and Dientamoeba fragilis in patients fulfilling irritable bowel syndrome criteria.
    Yakoob J; Jafri W; Beg MA; Abbas Z; Naz S; Islam M; Khan R
    Parasitol Res; 2010 Aug; 107(3):679-84. PubMed ID: 20532564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. First detection and molecular characterization of Dientamoeba fragilis in cattle.
    Yildiz İ; Erdem Aynur Z
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2022 Dec; 69(8):897-903. PubMed ID: 35796090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection and genotyping of Dientamoeba fragilis from symptomatic patients: New insights from Italy into a little-known gastrointestinal protozoan.
    Guadano-Procesi I; Berrilli F; Montalbano Di Filippo M; Di Cave D
    Parasitol Int; 2024 Feb; 98():102816. PubMed ID: 37838287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Molecular epidemiology of Dientamoeba fragilis.
    Cacciò SM
    Acta Trop; 2018 Aug; 184():73-77. PubMed ID: 28697994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective study of the prevalence, genotyping, and clinical relevance of Dientamoeba fragilis infections in an Australian population.
    Stark D; Beebe N; Marriott D; Ellis J; Harkness J
    J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Jun; 43(6):2718-23. PubMed ID: 15956388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No evidence of pathogenicity of Dientamoeba fragilis following detection in stools: A case-control study.
    Tchamwa Bamini G; Charpentier E; Guemas E; Chauvin P; Fillaux J; Valentin A; Cassaing S; Ménard S; Berry A; Iriart X
    Parasite; 2024; 31():40. PubMed ID: 39052010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The importance of considering the neglected intestinal protozoan parasite Dientamoeba fragilis.
    Intra J; Sarto C; Besana S; Tiberti N; Brambilla P
    J Med Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 68(6):890-892. PubMed ID: 31050625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.