180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14769065)
1. Parallel processing in visual search asymmetry.
Dosher BA; Han S; Lu ZL
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):3-27. PubMed ID: 14769065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determining subprocesses of visual feature search with reaction time models.
Müller-Plath G; Pollmann S
Psychol Res; 2003 May; 67(2):80-105. PubMed ID: 12739145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: a direct behavioral demonstration.
Bricolo E; Gianesini T; Fanini A; Bundesen C; Chelazzi L
J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):980-93. PubMed ID: 12419123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response selection in visual search: the influence of response compatibility of nontargets.
Starreveld PA; Theeuwes J; Mortier K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):56-78. PubMed ID: 14769068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times.
Sung K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1372-88. PubMed ID: 19045981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Set-size effects for identification versus localization depend on the visual search task.
Busey T; Palmer J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):790-810. PubMed ID: 18665726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parallel and serial processes in visual search.
Thornton TL; Gilden DL
Psychol Rev; 2007 Jan; 114(1):71-103. PubMed ID: 17227182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The mechanisms of involuntary attention.
Prinzmetal W; Ha R; Khani A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 20364917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources.
VanRullen R; Reddy L; Koch C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 15006031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do honeybees detect colour targets using serial or parallel visual search?
Spaethe J; Tautz J; Chittka L
J Exp Biol; 2006 Mar; 209(Pt 6):987-93. PubMed ID: 16513924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Search, enumeration, and aging: eye movement requirements cause age-equivalent performance in enumeration but not in search tasks.
Watson DG; Maylor EA; Bruce LA
Psychol Aging; 2005 Jun; 20(2):226-40. PubMed ID: 16029087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search.
Wolfe JM; Horowitz TS; Kenner N; Hyle M; Vasan N
Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1411-26. PubMed ID: 15066400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The time course of similarity effects in visual search.
Guest D; Lamberts K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1667-88. PubMed ID: 22004196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parallel and serial neural mechanisms for visual search in macaque area V4.
Bichot NP; Rossi AF; Desimone R
Science; 2005 Apr; 308(5721):529-34. PubMed ID: 15845848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Guidance of eye movements during visual conjunction search: local and global contextual effects on target discriminability.
Shen K; Paré M
J Neurophysiol; 2006 May; 95(5):2845-55. PubMed ID: 16467428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mirror-image symmetry and search asymmetry: a comparison of their effects on visual search and a possible unifying explanation.
Davis ET; Shikano T; Main K; Hailston K; Michel RK; Sathian K
Vision Res; 2006 Apr; 46(8-9):1263-81. PubMed ID: 16376402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Information-limited parallel processing in difficult heterogeneous covert visual search.
Dosher BA; Han S; Lu ZL
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1128-44. PubMed ID: 20873936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inhibition of return in static but not necessarily in dynamic search.
Wang Z; Zhang K; Klein RM
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jan; 72(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 20045881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parieto-occipital areas involved in efficient filtering in search: a time course analysis of visual marking using behavioural and functional imaging procedures.
Humphreys GW; Kyllingsbaek S; Watson DG; Olivers CN; Law I; Paulson OB
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 May; 57(4):610-35. PubMed ID: 15204126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
