178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14769068)
1. Response selection in visual search: the influence of response compatibility of nontargets.
Starreveld PA; Theeuwes J; Mortier K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):56-78. PubMed ID: 14769068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. When does visual attention select all features of a distractor?
Chen Z; Cave KR
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1452-64. PubMed ID: 17154784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources.
VanRullen R; Reddy L; Koch C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 15006031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clear distinction between preattentive and attentive process in schizophrenia by visual search performance.
Tanaka G; Mori S; Inadomi H; Hamada Y; Ohta Y; Ozawa H
Psychiatry Res; 2007 Jan; 149(1-3):25-31. PubMed ID: 17123633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do honeybees detect colour targets using serial or parallel visual search?
Spaethe J; Tautz J; Chittka L
J Exp Biol; 2006 Mar; 209(Pt 6):987-93. PubMed ID: 16513924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determining subprocesses of visual feature search with reaction time models.
Müller-Plath G; Pollmann S
Psychol Res; 2003 May; 67(2):80-105. PubMed ID: 12739145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attentional selection and word processing in Stroop and word search tasks: the role of selection for action.
Brown TL
Am J Psychol; 1996; 109(2):265-86. PubMed ID: 8644887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [A deficit in preattentive processing of visual information in schizophrenic patients].
Kojima K; Katayama S; Takaki M; Yoshioka S; Kawahara R
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2005; 107(3):235-47. PubMed ID: 15856747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times.
Sung K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1372-88. PubMed ID: 19045981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Parallel processing in visual search asymmetry.
Dosher BA; Han S; Lu ZL
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):3-27. PubMed ID: 14769065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Look here but ignore what you see: effects of distractors at fixation.
Beck DM; Lavie N
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Jun; 31(3):592-607. PubMed ID: 15982133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task.
Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 May; 116(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 15111228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of target and distractor heterogeneity on search for a color target.
Nagy AL; Neriani KE; Young TL
Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1885-99. PubMed ID: 15797778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stroop dilution revisited: evidence for domain-specific, limited-capacity processing.
Roberts MA; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 15709859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The development of visual search in infants and very young children.
Gerhardstein P; Rovee-Collier C
J Exp Child Psychol; 2002 Feb; 81(2):194-215. PubMed ID: 11786009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attentional requirements in a 'preattentive' feature search task.
Joseph JS; Chun MM; Nakayama K
Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6635):805-7. PubMed ID: 9194560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set.
Müller HJ; Geyer T; Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19170466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence of preliminary response preparation from a divided attention task.
Miller J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 Aug; 13(3):425-34. PubMed ID: 2958591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does selecting one visual object from several require inhibition of the actions associated with nonselected objects?
Ellis R; Tucker M; Symes E; Vainio L
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Jun; 33(3):670-91. PubMed ID: 17563229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extinction-like effects in normals: independence of localization and response selection.
Pollmann S
Brain Cogn; 2000 Dec; 44(3):324-41. PubMed ID: 11104529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
