These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14769069)

  • 41. Visual marking and the perception of salience in visual search.
    Gibson BS; Jiang Y
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jan; 63(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 11304017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Visual search of multiple signals].
    Fraisse P
    Annee Psychol; 1978; 78(2):349-73. PubMed ID: 752285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Memory for the search path: evidence for a high-capacity representation of search history.
    Dickinson CA; Zelinsky GJ
    Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(13):1745-55. PubMed ID: 17482657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Visual marking: dissociating effects of new and old set size.
    Jiang Y; Chun MM; Marks LE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Mar; 28(2):293-302. PubMed ID: 11911385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An exemplar-familiarity model predicts short-term and long-term probe recognition across diverse forms of memory search.
    Nosofsky RM; Cox GE; Cao R; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1524-39. PubMed ID: 24749963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Visual marking survives graphical change if meaning is retained.
    Osugi T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2144-56. PubMed ID: 21097858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied.
    Woodman GF; Luck SJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Apr; 11(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 15260192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Induced perceptual grouping.
    Vickery TJ
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jul; 19(7):693-701. PubMed ID: 18727785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Preview benefit survives a three-dimensional rotation of the rigid configuration of search items.
    Osugi T; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2019 Mar; 156():56-65. PubMed ID: 30682404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Resources masquerading as slots: Flexible allocation of visual working memory.
    Donkin C; Kary A; Tahir F; Taylor R
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Mar; 85():30-42. PubMed ID: 26794368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Response accuracy based upon recall from visual and kinesthetic short-term memory.
    Wilberg RB
    Res Q; 1969 May; 40(2):407-14. PubMed ID: 5255573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Integrating sequential arrays in visual short-term memory.
    Jiang Y; Kumar A; Vickery TJ
    Exp Psychol; 2005; 52(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 15779529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Finding a new target in an old display: evidence for a memory recency effect in visual search.
    Körner C; Gilchrist ID
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Oct; 14(5):846-51. PubMed ID: 18087948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Time window from visual images to visual short-term memory: consolidation or integration?
    Jiang Y
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 14959505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Visual marking in moving displays: feature-based inhibition is not necessary.
    Watson DG
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jan; 63(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 11304018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Marking rejected distractors: a gaze-contingent technique for measuring memory during search.
    Dickinson CA; Zelinsky GJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Dec; 12(6):1120-6. PubMed ID: 16615338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Age-related effects in the marking of old objects in visual search.
    Kramer AF; Atchley P
    Psychol Aging; 2000 Jun; 15(2):286-96. PubMed ID: 10879583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Visual memory and visual perception: when memory improves visual search.
    Riou B; Lesourd M; Brunel L; Versace R
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Aug; 39(6):1094-102. PubMed ID: 21298407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search.
    Boot WR; McCarley JS; Kramer AF; Peterson MS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Oct; 11(5):854-61. PubMed ID: 15732694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Self-terminating versus exhaustive processes in rapid visual and memory search: an evaluative review.
    Van Zandt T; Townsend JT
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 May; 53(5):563-80. PubMed ID: 8332425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.