These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14769081)

  • 21. The spontaneous use of a group typology as an organizing principle in memory.
    Sherman SJ; Castelli L; Hamilton DL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Mar; 82(3):328-42. PubMed ID: 11902620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Will a category cue attract you? Motor output reveals dynamic competition across person construal.
    Freeman JB; Ambady N; Rule NO; Johnson KL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):673-90. PubMed ID: 18999360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Recognition of faces of ingroup and outgroup children and adults.
    Corenblum B; Meissner CA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Mar; 93(3):187-206. PubMed ID: 16243349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nature and nurture in own-race face processing.
    Bar-Haim Y; Ziv T; Lamy D; Hodes RM
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Feb; 17(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 16466424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is face distinctiveness gender based?
    Baudouin JY; Gallay M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):789-98. PubMed ID: 16846279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Enhanced visual short-term memory for angry faces.
    Jackson MC; Wu CY; Linden DE; Raymond JE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):363-74. PubMed ID: 19331494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of experimental design on memory for typical and distinctive faces.
    Hosie JA; Milne AB
    Memory; 1996 Mar; 4(2):175-97. PubMed ID: 8697036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Race is gendered: how covarying phenotypes and stereotypes bias sex categorization.
    Johnson KL; Freeman JB; Pauker K
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):116-31. PubMed ID: 21875229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neural correlates of perceptual contributions to nondeclarative memory for faces.
    Boehm SG; Klostermann EC; Paller KA
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):1021-9. PubMed ID: 16368247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of inversion and eye displacements of familiar and unknown faces on early and late-stage ERPs.
    Caharel S; Fiori N; Bernard C; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 16678927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Face-memory and emotion: associations with major depression in children and adolescents.
    Pine DS; Lissek S; Klein RG; Mannuzza S; Moulton JL; Guardino M; Woldehawariat G
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2004 Oct; 45(7):1199-208. PubMed ID: 15335340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The neuroanatomic basis of facial perception and variable facial discrimination ability: implications for orthodontics.
    Masella RS; Meister M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 17826596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perception and recall of faces and facial expressions following temporal lobectomy.
    Carvajal F; Rubio S; Martín P; Serrano JM; García-Sola R
    Epilepsy Behav; 2009 Jan; 14(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 18804183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Face aftereffects indicate dissociable, but not distinct, coding of male and female faces.
    Jaquet E; Rhodes G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):101-12. PubMed ID: 18248142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Category contingent aftereffects for faces of different races, ages and species.
    Little AC; DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Waitt C
    Cognition; 2008 Mar; 106(3):1537-47. PubMed ID: 17707364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perceiving age and gender in unfamiliar faces: brain potential evidence for implicit and explicit person categorization.
    Wiese H; Schweinberger SR; Neumann MF
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Nov; 45(6):957-69. PubMed ID: 18823419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Visual working memory capacity for objects from different categories: a face-specific maintenance effect.
    Wong JH; Peterson MS; Thompson JC
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):719-31. PubMed ID: 18675409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Associative recognition of face pairs by younger and older adults: the role of familiarity-based processing.
    Rhodes MG; Castel AD; Jacoby LL
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Jun; 23(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 18573000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The allure of status: high-status targets are privileged in face processing and memory.
    Ratcliff NJ; Hugenberg K; Shriver ER; Bernstein MJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1003-15. PubMed ID: 21606215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessing the influence of recollection and familiarity in memory for own- versus other-race faces.
    Marcon JL; Susa KJ; Meissner CA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 19145017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.