BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14769082)

  • 21. Self-generated persuasion: effects of the target and direction of arguments.
    Briñol P; McCaslin MJ; Petty RE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 May; 102(5):925-40. PubMed ID: 22352326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prior source exposure and persuasion: further evidence for misattributional processes.
    Weisbuch M; Mackie DM; Garcia-Marques T
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Jun; 29(6):691-700. PubMed ID: 15189625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. When expertise backfires: contrast and assimilation effects in persuasion.
    Bohner G; Ruder M; Erb HP
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2002 Dec; 41(Pt 4):495-519. PubMed ID: 12593750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
    Horcajo J; Petty RE; Briñol P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Sep; 99(3):498-512. PubMed ID: 20649371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fear appeals motivate acceptance of action recommendations: evidence for a positive bias in the processing of persuasive messages.
    Das EH; de Wit JB; Stroebe W
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 May; 29(5):650-64. PubMed ID: 15272997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Promoting exercise behaviour: an integration of persuasion theories and the theory of planned behaviour.
    Jones LW; Sinclair RC; Rhodes RE; Courneya KS
    Br J Health Psychol; 2004 Nov; 9(Pt 4):505-21. PubMed ID: 15509358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The sleeper effect in persuasion: a meta-analytic review.
    Kumkale GT; Albarracín D
    Psychol Bull; 2004 Jan; 130(1):143-72. PubMed ID: 14717653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Recognizing and Trusting Persuasion Agents: Attitudes Bias Trustworthiness Judgments, but not Persuasion Detection.
    Grillo TLH; Pizzutti C
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2021 May; 47(5):796-809. PubMed ID: 32772871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. "Think" versus "feel" framing effects in persuasion.
    Mayer ND; Tormala ZL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Apr; 36(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 20363901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On the role of causal intervention in multiple-cue judgment: positive and negative effects on learning.
    Enkvist T; Newell B; Juslin P; Olsson H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):163-79. PubMed ID: 16478348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Discrete emotions and persuasion: the role of emotion-induced expectancies.
    DeSteno D; Petty RE; Rucker DD; Wegener DT; Braverman J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Jan; 86(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 14717627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Resistance to persuasion and attitude certainty: the moderating role of elaboration.
    Tormala ZL; Petty RE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Nov; 30(11):1446-57. PubMed ID: 15448308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Systematic and heuristic processing of majority and minority-endorsed messages: the effects of varying outcome relevance and levels of orientation on attitude and message processing.
    Martin R; Hewstone M; Martin PY
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Jan; 33(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 17178929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Attitudes and attitude change.
    Petty RE; Wegener DT; Fabrigar LR
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1997; 48():609-47. PubMed ID: 9046570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Assessing various aspects of the motivation to eat that can affect food intake and body weight control].
    Bellisle F
    Encephale; 2009 Apr; 35(2):182-5. PubMed ID: 19393389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Target processing is facilitated by motivationally relevant cues.
    Briggs KE; Martin FH
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Apr; 78(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 18262710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Incidental experiences of regulatory fit and the processing of persuasive appeals.
    Koenig AM; Cesario J; Molden DC; Kosloff S; Higgins ET
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1342-55. PubMed ID: 19571272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Are anthropomorphic persuasive appeals effective? The role of the recipient's motivations.
    Tam KP
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2015 Mar; 54(1):187-200. PubMed ID: 24898876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making.
    van 't Wout M; Sanfey AG
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):796-803. PubMed ID: 18721917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perceptions of entitativity and attitude change.
    Rydell RJ; McConnell AR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Jan; 31(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 15574665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.