These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14769082)

  • 41. Verbal expressions of confidence and doubt.
    Wesson CJ; Pulford BD
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Aug; 105(1):151-60. PubMed ID: 19810442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The perceived informational basis of attitudes: implications for subjective ambivalence.
    Tormala ZL; DeSensi VL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Feb; 34(2):275-87. PubMed ID: 18212335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The role of persuasive arguments in changing affirmative action attitudes and expressed behavior in higher education.
    White FA; Charles MA; Nelson JK
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Nov; 93(6):1271-86. PubMed ID: 19025247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effects of minority/majority source status on attitude certainty: a matching perspective.
    Tormala ZL; Desensi VL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jan; 35(1):114-25. PubMed ID: 19106081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Selective self-categorization: meaningful categorization and the in-group persuasion effect.
    Wyer NA
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(5):452-70. PubMed ID: 21058574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Attitude change: persuasion and social influence.
    Wood W
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2000; 51():539-70. PubMed ID: 10751980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Temporal framing and the decision to take part in type 2 diabetes screening: effects of individual differences in consideration of future consequences on persuasion.
    Orbell S; Hagger M
    Health Psychol; 2006 Jul; 25(4):537-48. PubMed ID: 16846330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Information integration in multiple cue judgment: a division of labor hypothesis.
    Juslin P; Karlsson L; Olsson H
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):259-98. PubMed ID: 17376423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion.
    Axsom D; Yates S; Chaiken S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1987 Jul; 53(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 3612491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Personalized persuasion: tailoring persuasive appeals to recipients' personality traits.
    Hirsh JB; Kang SK; Bodenhausen GV
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Jun; 23(6):578-81. PubMed ID: 22547658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Sensitivity of subjective questionnaires to cognitive loading while driving with navigation aids: a pilot study.
    Smyth CC
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2007 May; 78(5 Suppl):B39-50. PubMed ID: 17547303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluating three criteria for establishing cue-search hierarchies in inferential judgment.
    Rakow T; Newell BR; Fayers K; Hersby M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):1088-104. PubMed ID: 16248752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Interactive source and message effects in persuasion.
    Siu W
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Apr; 110(2):493-500. PubMed ID: 20499560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion.
    Mackie DM; Worth LT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1989 Jul; 57(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 2754602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A comparison of novice and expert nurses' cue collection during clinical decision-making: verbal protocol analysis.
    Hoffman KA; Aitken LM; Duffield C
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1335-44. PubMed ID: 19555954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Consumer psychology: categorization, inferences, affect, and persuasion.
    Loken B
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2006; 57():453-85. PubMed ID: 16318603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information.
    Kruglanski AW; Webster DM; Klem A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1993 Nov; 65(5):861-76. PubMed ID: 8246114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Weak > strong: the ironic effect of argument strength on supportive advocacy.
    Akhtar O; Paunesku D; Tormala ZL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1214-26. PubMed ID: 23798375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The epistemic-teleologic model of deliberate self-persuasion.
    Maio GR; Thomas G
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2007 Feb; 11(1):46-67. PubMed ID: 18453455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Information processing of genetically modified food messages under different motives: an adaptation of the multiple-motive heuristic-systematic model.
    Kim J; Paek HJ
    Risk Anal; 2009 Dec; 29(12):1793-806. PubMed ID: 19948001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.