These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups. Wright DB Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the diagnosticity of multiple-witness identifications. Clark SE; Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2008 Oct; 32(5):406-22. PubMed ID: 18095147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: computer-based lineup administration. MacLin OH; Zimmerman LA; Malpass RS Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 15965630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regularities in eyewitness identification. Clark SE; Howell RT; Davey SL Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):187-218. PubMed ID: 17410411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification. Clark SE Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):575-604. PubMed ID: 16254744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of lineup member similarity on recognition accuracy in simultaneous and sequential lineups. Flowe HD; Ebbesen EB Law Hum Behav; 2007 Feb; 31(1):33-52. PubMed ID: 17123159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Eyewitness confidence in simultaneous and sequential lineups: a criterion shift account for sequential mistaken identification overconfidence. Dobolyi DG; Dodson CS J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Dec; 19(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 24188335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification decisions. Clark SE; Marshall TE; Rosenthal R J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 19309217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Probative value of absolute and relative judgments in eyewitness identification. Clark SE; Erickson MA; Breneman J Law Hum Behav; 2011 Oct; 35(5):364-80. PubMed ID: 20953683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Children's identification of faces from lineups: the effects of lineup presentation and instructions on accuracy. Beresford J; Blades M J Appl Psychol; 2006 Sep; 91(5):1102-13. PubMed ID: 16953771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lineup composition, suspect position, and the sequential lineup advantage. Carlson CA; Gronlund SD; Clark SE J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Jun; 14(2):118-128. PubMed ID: 18590368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy. Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiple confidence estimates as indices of eyewitness memory. Sauer JD; Brewer N; Weber N J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):528-47. PubMed ID: 18729714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Confidence-accuracy calibration in absolute and relative face recognition judgments. Weber N; Brewer N J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Sep; 10(3):156-72. PubMed ID: 15462618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Suspect/foil identification in actual crimes and in the laboratory: a reality monitoring analysis. Behrman BW; Richards RE Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):279-301. PubMed ID: 15965629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Eyewitness lineups: is the appearance-change instruction a good idea? Charman SD; Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2007 Feb; 31(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 16612580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]