These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14769127)
1. Incremental validity of the frame-of-reference effect in personality scale scores: a replication and extension. Bing MN; Whanger JC; Davison HK; VanHook JB J Appl Psychol; 2004 Feb; 89(1):150-7. PubMed ID: 14769127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A closer look at the frame-of-reference effect in personality scale scores and validity. Lievens F; De Corte W; Schollaert E J Appl Psychol; 2008 Mar; 93(2):268-79. PubMed ID: 18361631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Social anxiety and fear of negative evaluation: construct validity of the BFNE-II. Carleton RN; Collimore KC; Asmundson GJ J Anxiety Disord; 2007; 21(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 16675196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Positive response distortion by police officer applicants: association of Paulhus Deception Scales With MMPI-2 and Inwald Personality Inventory Validity Scales. Detrick P; Chibnall JT Assessment; 2008 Mar; 15(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 18258735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Personnel selection and the five-factor model: reexamining the effects of appplicant's frame of reference. Smith DB; Hanges PJ; Dickson MW J Appl Psychol; 2001 Apr; 86(2):304-15. PubMed ID: 11393442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Racial differences in socially desirable responding in selection contexts: magnitude and consequences. Dudley NM; McFarland LA; Goodman SA; Hunt ST; Sydell EJ J Pers Assess; 2005 Aug; 85(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 16083384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Further evidence for the validity of assessment center dimensions: a meta-analysis of the incremental criterion-related validity of dimension ratings. Meriac JP; Hoffman BJ; Woehr DJ; Fleisher MS J Appl Psychol; 2008 Sep; 93(5):1042-52. PubMed ID: 18808224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of elaboration on socially desirable responding and the validity of biodata measures. Schmitt N; Oswald FL; Kim BH; Gillespie MA; Ramsay LJ; Yoo TY J Appl Psychol; 2003 Dec; 88(6):979-88. PubMed ID: 14640810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative validity of the Shedler and Westen Assessment Procedure-200. Mullins-Sweatt SN; Widiger TA Psychol Assess; 2008 Jun; 20(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 18557696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do warnings of response verification moderate the relationship between personality and cognitive ability? Vasilopoulos NL; Cucina JM; McElreath JM J Appl Psychol; 2005 Mar; 90(2):306-22. PubMed ID: 15769240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing personality with a structured employment interview: construct-related validity and susceptibility to response inflation. Van Iddekinge CH; Raymark PH; Roth PL J Appl Psychol; 2005 May; 90(3):536-52. PubMed ID: 15910148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. U.S. Air Force pilot selection tests: what is measured and what is predictive? Carretta TR; Ree MJ Aviat Space Environ Med; 1996 Mar; 67(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 8775411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring? Stark S; Chernyshenko OS; Drasgow F; Williams BA J Appl Psychol; 2006 Jan; 91(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 16435936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Constructing personality scales under the assumptions of an ideal point response process: toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures. Chernyshenko OS; Stark S; Drasgow F; Roberts BW Psychol Assess; 2007 Mar; 19(1):88-106. PubMed ID: 17371125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Pain coping strategies: French adaptation of the coping strategies questionnaire (CSQ-F)]. Irachabal S; Koleck M; Rascle N; Bruchon-Schweitzer M Encephale; 2008 Jan; 34(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 18514150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Socially desirable responding and its elusive effects on the validity of personality assessments. Paunonen SV; LeBel EP J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jul; 103(1):158-75. PubMed ID: 22564012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [An exploratory study of a personality disorders questionnaire]. Bouvard M; Cosma P Encephale; 2008 Oct; 34(5):517-25. PubMed ID: 19068342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incremental validity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 and symptom checklist-90-revised with mental health inpatients. Simonds EC; Handel RW; Archer RP Assessment; 2008 Mar; 15(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 18258734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A field study of frame-of-reference effects on personality test validity. Hunthausen JM; Truxillo DM; Bauer TN; Hammer LB J Appl Psychol; 2003 Jun; 88(3):545-51. PubMed ID: 12814302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Personality Assessment Inventory as a proxy for the Psychopathy Checklist Revised: testing the incremental validity and cross-sample robustness of the Antisocial Features Scale. Douglas KS; Guy LS; Edens JF; Boer DP; Hamilton J Assessment; 2007 Sep; 14(3):255-69. PubMed ID: 17690382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]