BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14769724)

  • 1. Methacholine challenge testing: comparison of the two American Thoracic Society-recommended methods.
    Wubbel C; Asmus MJ; Stevens G; Chesrown SE; Hendeles L
    Chest; 2004 Feb; 125(2):453-8. PubMed ID: 14769724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Difference between dosimeter and tidal breathing methacholine challenge: contributions of dose and deep inspiration bronchoprotection.
    Allen ND; Davis BE; Hurst TS; Cockcroft DW
    Chest; 2005 Dec; 128(6):4018-23. PubMed ID: 16354875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methacholine challenge: comparison of two methods.
    Cockcroft DW; Davis BE; Todd DC; Smycniuk AJ
    Chest; 2005 Mar; 127(3):839-44. PubMed ID: 15764765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two ATS recommended protocols for administration of methacholine are not equal.
    Burke RR; Obeid IM; Williams LK; Morris ZQ
    J Asthma; 2009 Sep; 46(7):740-4. PubMed ID: 19728216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of challenge method on sensitivity, reactivity, and maximal response to methacholine.
    Prieto L; Ferrer A; Domenech J; Pérez-Francés C
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2006 Aug; 97(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16937747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 between the AeroEclipse II breath-actuated nebulizer and the wright nebulizer in adult subjects with asthma.
    El-Gammal AI; Killian KJ; Scime TX; Beaudin S; Schlatman A; Cockcroft DW; Gauvreau GM
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2015 Jul; 12(7):1039-43. PubMed ID: 25871542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two standardized methods of methacholine inhalation challenge in young adults.
    Siersted HC; Walker CM; O'Shaughnessy AD; Willan AR; Wiecek EM; Sears MR
    Eur Respir J; 2000 Jan; 15(1):181-4. PubMed ID: 10678643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in the response to methacholine between the tidal breathing and dosimeter methods: influence of the dose of bronchoconstrictor agent delivered to the mouth.
    Prieto L; Lopez V; Llusar R; Rojas R; Marin J
    Chest; 2008 Oct; 134(4):699-703. PubMed ID: 18625670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 should be used to interpret methacholine challenge tests with modern nebulizers.
    Dell SD; Bola SS; Foty RG; Marshall LC; Nelligan KA; Coates AL
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2015 Mar; 12(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 25575246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methacholine bronchial challenge using a dosimeter with controlled tidal breathing.
    Nieminen MM; Lahdensuo A; Kellomaeki L; Karvonen J; Muittari A
    Thorax; 1988 Nov; 43(11):896-900. PubMed ID: 3065974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methacholine challenge test: Comparison of tidal breathing and dosimeter methods in children.
    Mazi A; Lands LC; Zielinski D
    Pediatr Pulmonol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):174-180. PubMed ID: 29178471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a 1-concentration-4-step dosimeter protocol for methacholine testing.
    Merget R; Jörres RA; Heinze E; Haufs MG; Taeger D; Brüning T
    Respir Med; 2009 Apr; 103(4):607-13. PubMed ID: 19010655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of a single dose of montelukast sodium on methacholine chloride PC20.
    Davis BE; Cockcroft DW
    Can Respir J; 2005; 12(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 15776131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methacholine challenge: test-shortening procedures.
    Cockcroft DW; Marciniuk DD; Hurst TS; Cotton DJ; Laframboise KF; McNab BD; Skomro RP
    Chest; 2001 Dec; 120(6):1857-60. PubMed ID: 11742913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship of mannitol challenge to methacholine challenge and inflammatory markers in persistent asthmatics receiving inhaled corticosteroids.
    Anderson WJ; Lipworth BJ
    Lung; 2012 Oct; 190(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 22684880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dosimeter methacholine challenge: comparison of maximal versus submaximal inhalations.
    Todd DC; Davis BE; Hurst TS; Cockcroft DW
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2004 Sep; 114(3):517-9. PubMed ID: 15356550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new tidal breathing measurement device detects bronchial obstruction during methacholine challenge test.
    Zachariades A; Bachar N; Danino N; Shafran I; Shtrichman R; Shuster G; Voigt W
    Adv Med Sci; 2024 Mar; 69(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 38096771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methacholine Challenge Testing: A Novel Method for Measuring PD
    Davis BE; Simonson SK; Blais CM; Cockcroft DW
    Chest; 2017 Dec; 152(6):1251-1257. PubMed ID: 28923758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methacholine challenge test: diagnostic characteristics in asthmatic patients receiving controller medications.
    Sumino K; Sugar EA; Irvin CG; Kaminsky DA; Shade D; Wei CY; Holbrook JT; Wise RA; Castro M;
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2012 Jul; 130(1):69-75.e6. PubMed ID: 22465214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: general considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests.
    Coates AL; Wanger J; Cockcroft DW; Culver BH; ; Diamant Z; Gauvreau G; Hall GL; Hallstrand TS; Horvath I; de Jongh FHC; Joos G; Kaminsky DA; Laube BL; Leuppi JD; Sterk PJ
    Eur Respir J; 2017 May; 49(5):. PubMed ID: 28461290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.