442 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14770433)
21. A comparison of three histological grading systems in endometrial cancer.
Bilgin T; Ozuysal S; Ozan H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Jun; 272(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 15241614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Stage II endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: clinical implications of cervical stromal invasion.
Orezzoli JP; Sioletic S; Olawaiye A; Oliva E; del Carmen MG
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 19345400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The prognostic value of semiquantitative nuclear grading in endometrial carcinomas.
Hachisuga T; Kawarabayashi T; Iwasaka T; Sugimori H; Kamura T; Tsuneyoshi M
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Apr; 65(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 9103400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prognostic impact of morphometric nuclear grade of endometrial carcinoma.
Salvesen HB; Iversen OE; Akslen LA
Cancer; 1998 Sep; 83(5):956-64. PubMed ID: 9731900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prognostic significance of grading and staging systems using MIB-1 score in adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk.
Hasegawa T; Yamamoto S; Yokoyama R; Umeda T; Matsuno Y; Hirohashi S
Cancer; 2002 Aug; 95(4):843-51. PubMed ID: 12209729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Rate of proliferation as a prognostic criterion in endometrial carcinoma--an immunohistochemical analysis with the monoclonal antibody KI-S1].
Backe J; Gassel AM; Müller T; Schön S; Kaesemann H
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(7):334-42. PubMed ID: 9340973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Unusual epithelial and stromal changes in myoinvasive endometrioid adenocarcinoma: a study of their frequency, associated diagnostic problems, and prognostic significance.
Murray SK; Young RH; Scully RE
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2003 Oct; 22(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 14501811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reproducibility and prognostic variability of grade and lamina propria invasion in stages Ta, T1 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.
Bol MG; Baak JP; Buhr-Wildhagen S; Kruse AJ; Kjellevold KH; Janssen EA; Mestad O; Øgreid P
J Urol; 2003 Apr; 169(4):1291-4. PubMed ID: 12629345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of FIGO 1989 and 2009 recommendations on staging of endometrial carcinoma: pathologic analysis and cervical status in 123 consecutive cases.
Korczynski J; Jesionek-Kupnicka D; Gottwald L; Piekarski J
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2011 Jul; 30(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 21623209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Preoperative platelet count as index of the grading in endometrial carcinoma].
Giannella L; Menozzi G; Di Monte I; Venturini P; De Pace V; Boselli F; Ternelli G; Jasonni VM
Minerva Ginecol; 2008 Aug; 60(4):273-9. PubMed ID: 18560341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Intravaginal brachytherapy alone for intermediate-risk endometrial cancer.
Alektiar KM; Venkatraman E; Chi DS; Barakat RR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 May; 62(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 15850910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Adjuvant chemotherapy as treatment of high-risk stage I and II endometrial cancer.
Aoki Y; Watanabe M; Amikura T; Obata H; Sekine M; Yahata T; Fujita K; Tanaka K
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Aug; 94(2):333-9. PubMed ID: 15297170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prospective multicenter validation confirms the prognostic superiority of the endometrial carcinoma prognostic index in international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage 1 and 2 endometrial carcinoma.
Baak JP; Snijders W; van Diermen B; van Diest PJ; Diepenhorst FW; Benraadt J
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Nov; 21(22):4214-21. PubMed ID: 14615450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Significant variation in the assessment of cervical involvement in endometrial carcinoma: an interobserver variation study.
McCluggage WG; Hirschowitz L; Wilson GE; Oliva E; Soslow RA; Zaino RJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Feb; 35(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 21263250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in endometrial carcinoma].
Li B; Wu LY; Li SM; Zhang WH; Zhang R; Ma SK
Ai Zheng; 2004 Sep; 23(9):1085-8. PubMed ID: 15363208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The impact of age on long-term outcome in patients with endometrial cancer treated with postoperative radiation.
Jolly S; Vargas CE; Kumar T; Weiner SA; Brabbins DS; Chen PY; Floyd W; Martinez AA
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Oct; 103(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 16545441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Long-term outcome in endometrial carcinoma favors a two- instead of a three-tiered grading system.
Scholten AN; Creutzberg CL; Noordijk EM; Smit VT
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):1067-74. PubMed ID: 11958903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pelvic lymph node count is an important prognostic variable for FIGO stage I and II endometrial carcinoma with high-risk histology.
Lutman CV; Havrilesky LJ; Cragun JM; Secord AA; Calingaert B; Berchuck A; Clarke-Pearson DL; Soper JT
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 16406063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Interobserver and intraobserver variability of a two-tier system for grading ovarian serous carcinoma.
Malpica A; Deavers MT; Tornos C; Kurman RJ; Soslow R; Seidman JD; Munsell MF; Gaertner E; Frishberg D; Silva EG
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Aug; 31(8):1168-74. PubMed ID: 17667538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Does the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for endometrial cancer lead to increased discrimination in patient outcomes?
Cooke EW; Pappas L; Gaffney DK
Cancer; 2011 Sep; 117(18):4231-7. PubMed ID: 21387282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
