These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1479368)

  • 1. Revision arthroplasty facilitated by ultrasonic tool cement removal. An evaluation of whole bone strength in a canine model.
    Callaghan JJ; Elder SH; Stranne SK; Fulghum CF; Seaber AV; Myers BS
    J Arthroplasty; 1992 Dec; 7(4):495-500. PubMed ID: 1479368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Would revision arthroplasty be facilitated by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? An evaluation including whole bone strength in dogs.
    Stranne SK; Callaghan JJ; Cocks FH; Weinerth JL; Seaber AV; Myers BS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Feb; (287):252-8. PubMed ID: 8448953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revision arthroplasty facilitated by ultrasonic tool cement removal. Part II: Histologic analysis of endosteal bone after cement removal.
    Caillouette JT; Gorab RS; Klapper RC; Anzel SH
    Orthop Rev; 1991 May; 20(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 2067878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revision arthroplasty facilitated by ultrasonic tool cement removal. Part I: In vitro evaluation.
    Caillouette JT; Gorab RS; Klapper RC; Anzel SH
    Orthop Rev; 1991 Apr; 20(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 2041658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasonic technology in revision joint arthroplasty.
    Klapper RC; Caillouette JT; Callaghan JJ; Hozack WJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):147-54. PubMed ID: 1446431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revision total hip arthroplasty using ultrasonically driven tools. A clinical evaluation.
    Gardiner R; Hozack WJ; Nelson C; Keating EM
    J Arthroplasty; 1993 Oct; 8(5):517-21. PubMed ID: 8245997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty.
    Dohmae Y; Bechtold JE; Sherman RE; Puno RM; Gustilo RB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Nov; (236):214-20. PubMed ID: 3180573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimal femoral cortical thickness necessary to prevent perforation by ultrasonic tools in joint revision surgery.
    Brooks AT; Nelson CL; Hofmann OE
    J Arthroplasty; 1995 Jun; 10(3):359-62. PubMed ID: 7673915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Ultrasonic technique for removing bone cement in total hip revision arthroplasty].
    Blacha J; Kozak J; Bednarek A
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 1995; 60(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 7671727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of an ultrasonic device on temperatures generated in bone and on bone-cement structure.
    Brooks AT; Nelson CL; Stewart CL; Skinner RA; Siems ML
    J Arthroplasty; 1993 Aug; 8(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 8409994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Work-in-progress #1. The lithotriptor and its potential use in the revision of total hip arthroplasty.
    Karpman RR; Magee FP; Gruen TW; Mobley T
    Orthop Rev; 1987 Jan; 16(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 3453956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of ultrasonic tools in revision arthroplasty procedures.
    Klapper RC; Caillouette JT
    Contemp Orthop; 1990 Mar; 20(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 10148050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Femoral cement extraction in revision total hip arthroplasty--an in vitro study comparing computer-assisted freehand-navigated cement removal to conventional cement extraction.
    Mumme T; Friedrich MJ; Rode H; Gravius S; Andereya S; Müller-Rath R; de la Fuente M
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2015 Dec; 60(6):567-75. PubMed ID: 26053005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy analysis of emissions from cement when using ultrasonically driven tools.
    Shewale SB; Briggs RD
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Oct; 76(5):647-50. PubMed ID: 16263610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Femoral cement removal in revision total hip arthroplasty. A biomechanical analysis.
    Dennis DA; Dingman CA; Meglan DA; O'Leary JF; Mallory TH; Berme N
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Jul; (220):142-7. PubMed ID: 3594984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Total hip revision arthroplasty. Prosthesis and cement removal techniques.
    Gray FB
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1992 Apr; 23(2):313-9. PubMed ID: 1570143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental stabilization of segmental defects in the human femur. A torsional study.
    Mensch JS; Markolf KL; Roberts SB; Finerman GM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1976 Mar; 58(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 1254622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of high-energy shock waves for bone cement removal.
    May TC; Krause WR; Preslar AJ; Smith MJ; Beaudoin AJ; Cardea JA
    J Arthroplasty; 1990 Mar; 5(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 2319244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical effects of the extended trochanteric osteotomy.
    Noble AR; Branham DB; Willis MC; Owen JR; Cramer BW; Wayne JS; Jiranek WA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Mar; 87(3):521-9. PubMed ID: 15741617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of femoral stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented porous-coated total hip prostheses. Comparison of straight-stem and curved-stem designs.
    Callaghan JJ; Fulghum CS; Glisson RR; Stranne SK
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1992 Jul; 74(6):839-48. PubMed ID: 1634574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.