These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1480272)
21. A biomechanical comparison of three surgical approaches in bilateral subaxial cervical facet dislocation. Kim SM; Lim TJ; Paterno J; Park J; Kim DH J Neurosurg Spine; 2004 Jul; 1(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 15291030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level anterior discectomy and a one-level corpectomy, combined with fusion and anterior plate reconstruction in the cervical spine. Aghayev K; Doulgeris JJ; Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Eleraky M; Lee WE; Vrionis FD Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2014 Jan; 29(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 24239024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Should we recommend occipital plate fixation using bicortical screws or inverted occipital hooks to optimize occipito-cervical junction fusion? A biomechanical study combining an experimental and analytical approach. Germaneau A; Vendeuvre T; Delmotte A; D'Houtaud S; Brèque C; Petureau L; Doumalin P; Dupré JC; Brémand F; Maxy P; Richer JP; Rigoard P Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2020 Dec; 80():105173. PubMed ID: 33010700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparative biomechanical study of a novel integrated plate spacer for stabilization of cervical spine: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Majid K; Chinthakunta S; Muzumdar A; Khalil S Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Jul; 27(6):532-6. PubMed ID: 22244511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative studies of cervical spine anterior stabilization systems--Finite element analysis. Mackiewicz A; Banach M; Denisiewicz A; Bedzinski R Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2016 Feb; 32():72-9. PubMed ID: 26851563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Application of a stand-alone interbody fusion cage based on a novel porous TiO2/glass ceramic--2: Biomechanical evaluation after implantation in the sheep cervical spine]. Korinth MC; Hero T; Pandorf T; Zell D Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Apr; 50(4):111-8. PubMed ID: 15884708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Excision of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament During Anterior Cervical Corpectomy: A Biomechanical Study. Daubs MD; Patel AA; Lawrence BD; Brodke DS Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Jul; 29(6):242-7. PubMed ID: 23059704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Anterior occiput to axis screw fixation: part II: a biomechanical comparison with posterior fixation techniques. Dvorak MF; Sekeramayi F; Zhu Q; Hoekema J; Fisher C; Boyd M; Goertzen DJ; Oxland TR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 12567024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Posterior lateral mass plate fixation of the cervical spine. Lindsey RW; Miclau T J South Orthop Assoc; 2000; 9(1):36-42; discussion 42. PubMed ID: 12132809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Anterior cervical fixation: analysis of load-sharing and stability with use of static and dynamic plates. Brodke DS; Klimo P; Bachus KN; Braun JT; Dailey AT J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Jul; 88(7):1566-73. PubMed ID: 16818983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanical comparison of a novel C1 posterior locking plate with the harms technique in a C1-C2 fixation model. Kelly BP; Glaser JA; DiAngelo DJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(24):E920-5. PubMed ID: 19011532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices. Scholz M; Reyes PM; Schleicher P; Sawa AG; Baek S; Kandziora F; Marciano FF; Crawford NR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19139665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: Laboratory investigation. Setzer M; Eleraky M; Johnson WM; Aghayev K; Tran ND; Vrionis FD J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 22423633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Limitations of the cervical porcine spine in evaluating spinal implants in comparison with human cervical spinal segments: a biomechanical in vitro comparison of porcine and human cervical spine specimens with different instrumentation techniques. Schmidt R; Richter M; Claes L; Puhl W; Wilke HJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jun; 30(11):1275-82. PubMed ID: 15928552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biomechanical evaluations of various c1-c2 posterior fixation techniques. Sim HB; Lee JW; Park JT; Mindea SA; Lim J; Park J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Mar; 36(6):E401-7. PubMed ID: 21372651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biomechanical comparison of transfacet screws to lateral mass screw-rod constructs in the lower cervical spine. Tong J; Ji W; Zhou R; Huang Z; Liu S; Zhu Q Eur Spine J; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1787-93. PubMed ID: 26530298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]