These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Photoscreening for amblyogenic factors. Ottar WL; Scott WE; Holgado SI J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 1995; 32(5):289-95. PubMed ID: 8531032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Photoscreening for amblyogenic factors by public health personnel: the Eyecor Camera System. Enzenauer RW; Freeman HL; Larson MR; Williams TL Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2000 Mar; 7(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 10652167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The efficacy of photoscreening for amblyopiagenic factors in a high risk population. Enzenauer RW Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2003; 18(4):233-40. PubMed ID: 14653776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitivity of the MTI photoscreener for amblyogenic factors in infancy and early childhood. Weinand F; Gräf M; Demming K Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Nov; 236(11):801-5. PubMed ID: 9825254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pediatric photoscreening for strabismus and refractive errors in a high-risk population. Simons BD; Siatkowski RM; Schiffman JC; Berry BE; Flynn JT Ophthalmology; 1999 Jun; 106(6):1073-80. PubMed ID: 10366073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for amblyopia in preverbal children with photoscreening photographs: II. Sensitivity and specificity of the MTI photoscreener. Tong PY; Bassin RE; Enke-Miyazaki E; Macke JP; Tielsch JM; Stager DR; Beauchamp GR; Parks MM Ophthalmology; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1623-9. PubMed ID: 10964818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for amblyogenic factors using a volunteer lay network and the MTI photoscreener. Initial results from 15,000 preschool children in a statewide effort. Donahue SP; Johnson TM; Leonard-Martin TC Ophthalmology; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1637-44; discussion 1645-6. PubMed ID: 10964820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity of photoscreening to detect high-magnitude amblyogenic factors. Donahue SP; Johnson TM; Ottar W; Scott WE J AAPOS; 2002 Apr; 6(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 11997804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The polaroid suppression test in a pediatric population with ophthalmologic disorders. Pott JW; Kingma C; Verhoeff K; Grootendorst RJ; de Faber JT J AAPOS; 2003 Apr; 7(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 12736628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Photoscreening to detect potential amblyopia. Maslin K; Hope C Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1990 Aug; 18(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 2261179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The performance of visual photoscreening for Chinese preschool children aged 4 to 5 years]. Li R; Huang D; Zhu H; Sun QG; Wang Y; Zhang XH; Zhao XY; He J; Liu L; Zhou JJ; Liu H Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Mar; 56(3):189-196. PubMed ID: 32187947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the iScreen digital screening system for amblyogenic factors. Kennedy RA; Thomas DE Can J Ophthalmol; 2000 Aug; 35(5):258-62. PubMed ID: 10959465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The accuracy of the plusoptiX A08 photoscreener in detecting risk factors for amblyopia in central Iowa. Bloomberg JD; Suh DW J AAPOS; 2013 Jun; 17(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 23791414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Photoscreening for refractive errors in children and young adults with severe learning disabilities using the MTI photoscreener. Watts P; Walker K; Beck L Eye (Lond); 1999 Jun; 13 ( Pt 3a)():363-8. PubMed ID: 10624435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]