86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1481723)
1. Bone mass measurement by DXA: influence of analysis procedures and interunit variation.
Trevisan C; Gandolini GG; Sibilla P; Penotti M; Caraceni MP; Ortolani S
J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Dec; 7(12):1373-82. PubMed ID: 1481723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.
Genant HK; Grampp S; Glüer CC; Faulkner KG; Jergas M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Van Kuijk C
J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Oct; 9(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 7817795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of four methods for cross-calibrating dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers to eliminate systematic errors when upgrading equipment.
Finkelstein JS; Butler JP; Cleary RL; Neer RM
J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Dec; 9(12):1945-52. PubMed ID: 7872060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical considerations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based bone mineral measurements for pediatric studies.
Koo WW; Walters J; Bush AJ
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Dec; 10(12):1998-2004. PubMed ID: 8619381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of analytic software and scan analysis technique on the comparison of dual X-ray absorptiometry with dual photon absorptiometry of the hip in the elderly.
Kiel DP; Mercier CA; Dawson-Hughes B; Cali C; Hannan MT; Anderson JJ
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1130-6. PubMed ID: 7484290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correcting the magnification error of fan beam densitometers.
Griffiths MR; Noakes KA; Pocock NA
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jan; 12(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 9240734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of spine bone mineral density in ovariectomized rats using DXA.
Yamauchi H; Kushida K; Yamazaki K; Inoue T
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1033-9. PubMed ID: 7484278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of rates of bone loss from the spine measured using two manufacturers' densitometers.
Peel NF; Eastell R
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Nov; 10(11):1796-801. PubMed ID: 8592958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of DXA absorptiometry: a model for bone loss estimates.
Fuleihan GE; Testa MA; Angell JE; Porrino N; Leboff MS
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1004-14. PubMed ID: 7484275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of spinal and femoral bone density by dual X-ray absorptiometry: comparison of lunar and hologic instruments.
Pocock NA; Sambrook PN; Nguyen T; Kelly P; Freund J; Eisman JA
J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Sep; 7(9):1081-4. PubMed ID: 1414500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of raloxifene effects on the lumbar vertebrae and femora of ovariectomized rats.
Sato M; McClintock C; Kim J; Turner CH; Bryant HU; Magee D; Slemenda CW
J Bone Miner Res; 1994 May; 9(5):715-24. PubMed ID: 8053401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A).
Barthe N; Braillon P; Ducassou D; Basse-Cathalinat B
Br J Radiol; 1997 Jul; 70(835):728-39. PubMed ID: 9245885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Universal standardization of bone density measurements: a method with optimal properties for calibration among several instruments.
Hui SL; Gao S; Zhou XH; Johnston CC; Lu Y; Glüer CC; Grampp S; Genant H
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1463-70. PubMed ID: 9286763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Differences in Bone Mineral Density Measurement With 3 Hologic Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan Modes.
Yu W; Zhang Z; Pan W; Guan W; Lin Q; Xia W; Li T; Hsieh E
J Clin Densitom; 2021; 24(4):645-650. PubMed ID: 33504451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cross-Calibrated Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scanners Demonstrate Systematic Bias in Pediatric and Young Adult Females.
Dowthwaite JN; Dunsmore KA; Wang D; Rosenbaum PF; Scerpella TA
J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(2):281-294. PubMed ID: 28258886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro comparability of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) bone densitometers.
Rencken ML; Murano R; Drinkwater BL; Chesnut CH
Calcif Tissue Int; 1991 Apr; 48(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 2059876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of phantoms for cross-calibration of lumbar spine DXA.
Pearson D; Cawte SA; Green DJ
Osteoporos Int; 2002 Dec; 13(12):948-54. PubMed ID: 12459937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison and cross-calibration of DXA systems: ODX-240 and Sophos L-XRA versus Hologic QDR-4500, for spinal bone mineral measurement. Translation of a reference database.
Benmalek A; Sabatier JP
Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(6):570-7. PubMed ID: 10326063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of a phantom for morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.
Rea JA; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):341-50. PubMed ID: 11387153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cross-calibration of DXA equipment: upgrading from a Hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000.
Faulkner KG; Glüer CC; Estilo M; Genant HK
Calcif Tissue Int; 1993 Feb; 52(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 8443695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
