These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1481723)

  • 21. Intersite comparison of the Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray bone densitometer.
    Blake GM; Tong CM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1991 May; 64(761):440-6. PubMed ID: 2036569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.
    Blake GM; Parker JC; Buxton FM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Oct; 66(790):902-6. PubMed ID: 8220974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Instrument performance in bone density testing at five Australian centres.
    Khan KM; Henzell SL; Broderick C; Prince RL; Saul A; Lomman J; Wark JD
    Aust N Z J Med; 1997 Oct; 27(5):526-30. PubMed ID: 9404582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Calibration and standardization of bone mineral densitometers.
    Kelly TL; Slovik DM; Neer RM
    J Bone Miner Res; 1989 Oct; 4(5):663-9. PubMed ID: 2816511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy and precision of 62 bone densitometers using a European Spine Phantom.
    Kolta S; Ravaud P; Fechtenbaum J; Dougados M; Roux C
    Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 10501774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A new technique for precisely and accurately measuring lumbar spine bone mineral density in mice using clinical dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
    Katikaneni R; Ponnapakkam A; Miller E; Ponnapakkam T; Gensure RC
    Toxicol Mech Methods; 2009 Mar; 19(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 19750018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Large variations occur in bone density measurements of children when using different software.
    Simpson DE; Dontu VS; Stephens SE; Archbold LJ; Lowe V; O'Doherty MJ; Martin N; Coakley AJ
    Nucl Med Commun; 2005 Jun; 26(6):483-7. PubMed ID: 15891590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cross calibration of QDR-2000 and QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray densitometers for bone mineral and soft-tissue measurements.
    Abrahamsen B; Gram J; Hansen TB; Beck-Nielsen H
    Bone; 1995 Mar; 16(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 7786643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long-term performance in vitro and in vivo of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Reginster JY; Deroisy R; Zegels B; Jupsin I; Albert A; Franchimont P
    Clin Rheumatol; 1995 Mar; 14(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 7789060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vivo differences among scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Bandirali M; Sconfienza LM; Aliprandi A; Di Leo G; Marchelli D; Ulivieri FM; Sardanelli F
    Radiol Med; 2014 Apr; 119(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 24297585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cross calibration of DXA as part of an equipment replacement program.
    Pearson D; Horton B; Green DJ
    J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 16931346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Precision of dual X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral computed tomography using mobile densitometry units.
    Wapniarz M; Lehmann R; Randerath O; Baedeker S; John W; Klein K; Allolio B
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1994 Mar; 54(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 8055370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Towards standardization of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the forearm: a common region of interest (ROI) improves the comparability among DXA devices.
    Prevrhal S; Lu Y; Genant HK; Toschke JO; Shepherd JA
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 May; 76(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 15868279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A multicenter comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers: in vivo and in vitro measurements of bone mineral content and density.
    Economos CD; Nelson ME; Fiatarone MA; Dallal GE; Heymsfield SB; Wang J; Russell-Aulet M; Yasumura S; Ma R; Vaswani AN; Pierson RN
    J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Feb; 11(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 8822352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A) for in vivo bone mass measurement in the baboon (Papio ursinus).
    Mas ID; Biscardi A; Ripamonti U
    J Clin Densitom; 2002; 5(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 12357069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cross-calibration, precision and patient dose measurements in preparation for clinical trials using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.
    Cawte SA; Pearson D; Green DJ; Maslanka WB; Miller CG; Rogers AT
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Apr; 72(856):354-62. PubMed ID: 10474496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Solid anthropomorphic infant whole-body DXA phantom: design, evaluation, and multisite testing.
    Shypailo RJ; Ellis KJ
    Pediatr Res; 2013 Nov; 74(5):486-93. PubMed ID: 23999072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dose absorption in lumbar and femoral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry examinations using three different scan modalities: an anthropomorphic phantom study.
    Bandirali M; Lanza E; Messina C; Sconfienza LM; Brambilla R; Maurizio R; Marchelli D; Piodi LP; Di Leo G; Ulivieri FM; Sardanelli F
    J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(3):279-282. PubMed ID: 23535250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of dual photon and dual energy X-ray bone densitometers in a clinic setting.
    Nelson DA; Brown EB; Flynn MJ; Cody DD; Shaffer S
    Skeletal Radiol; 1991; 20(8):591-5. PubMed ID: 1776026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Precision and accuracy for rat whole body and femur bone mineral determination with dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    Hagiwara S; Lane N; Engelke K; Sebastian A; Kimmel DB; Genant HK
    Bone Miner; 1993 Jul; 22(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 8219938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.