These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1482904)

  • 41. MedWeaver: integrating decision support, literature searching, and Web exploration using the UMLS Metathesaurus.
    Detmer WM; Barnett GO; Hersh WR
    Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp; 1997; ():490-4. PubMed ID: 9357674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Auditing the multiply-related concepts within the UMLS.
    Mougin F; Grabar N
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2014 Oct; 21(e2):e185-93. PubMed ID: 24464853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Towards linking patients and clinical information: detecting UMLS concepts in e-mail.
    Brennan PF; Aronson AR
    J Biomed Inform; 2003; 36(4-5):334-41. PubMed ID: 14643729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An evaluation of the utility of the CEN categorical structure for nursing diagnoses as a terminology model for integrating nursing diagnosis concepts into SNOMED.
    Bakken S; Warren J; Lundberg C; Casey A; Correia C; Konicek D; Zingo C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):151-5. PubMed ID: 11604723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An ontological analysis of the UMLS Metathesaurus.
    Pisanelli DM; Gangemi A; Steve G
    Proc AMIA Symp; 1998; ():810-4. PubMed ID: 9929331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The comparative study on concept representation between the UMLS and the clinical terms in Korean medical records.
    Han SB; Choi J
    Int J Med Inform; 2005 Jan; 74(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 15626637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Consumer health concepts that do not map to the UMLS: where do they fit?
    Keselman A; Smith CA; Divita G; Kim H; Browne AC; Leroy G; Zeng-Treitler Q
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2008; 15(4):496-505. PubMed ID: 18436906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The semantic structure of the UMLS Metathesaurus.
    Nelson SJ; Fuller LF; Erlbaum MS; Tuttle MS; Sherertz DD; Olson NE
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1992; ():649-53. PubMed ID: 1482952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Merging terminologies.
    Tuttle MS; Suarez-Munist ON; Olson NE; Sherertz DD; Sperzel WD; Erlbaum MS; Fuller LF; Hole WT; Nelson SJ; Cole WG
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 1():162-6. PubMed ID: 8591144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Terms used by nurses to describe patient problems: can SNOMED III represent nursing concepts in the patient record?
    Henry SB; Holzemer WL; Reilly CA; Campbell KE
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 1994; 1(1):61-74. PubMed ID: 7719788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Discovering missed synonymy in a large concept-oriented Metathesaurus.
    Hole WT; Srinivasan S
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2000; ():354-8. PubMed ID: 11079904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Meeting medical terminology needs--the Ontology-Enhanced Medical Concept Mapper.
    Leroy G; Chen H
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2001 Dec; 5(4):261-70. PubMed ID: 11759832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Enhancing the Metathesaurus with clinically relevant concepts: anatomic representations.
    Sato L; McClure RC; Rouse RL; Schatz CA; Greenes RA
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1992; ():388-91. PubMed ID: 1482903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Development of the nursing problem list subset of SNOMED CT®.
    Matney SA; Warren JJ; Evans JL; Kim TY; Coenen A; Auld VA
    J Biomed Inform; 2012 Aug; 45(4):683-8. PubMed ID: 22202620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Siamese KG-LSTM: A deep learning model for enriching UMLS Metathesaurus synonymy.
    Tran TTT; Nghiem SV; Le VT; Quan TT; Nguyen V; Yip HY; Bodenreider O
    Int Conf Knowl Syst Eng; 2020 Nov; 2020():281-286. PubMed ID: 36277606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. An expert study evaluating the UMLS lexical metaschema.
    Zhang L; Hripcsak G; Perl Y; Halper M; Geller J
    Artif Intell Med; 2005 Jul; 34(3):219-33. PubMed ID: 15996860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Mapping Japanese medical terms to UMLS Metathesaurus.
    Onogi Y; Ohe K; Tanaka M; Nozoe A; Sasaki T; Sato M; Kikuchi Y; Shinohara T; Suzuki H; Kaihara S; Seyama Y
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):406-10. PubMed ID: 15360844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Auditing the UMLS for redundant classifications.
    Peng Y; Halper MH; Perl Y; Geller J
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2002; ():612-6. PubMed ID: 12463896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. In their own words? A terminological analysis of e-mail to a cancer information service.
    Smith CA; Stavri PZ; Chapman WW
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2002; ():697-701. PubMed ID: 12463914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A comparison of four schemes for codification of problem lists.
    Campbell JR; Payne TH
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1994; ():201-5. PubMed ID: 7949920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.