These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

556 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1484462)

  • 1. Insanity: making law in the absence of evidence.
    Finkel NJ
    Med Law; 1992; 11(5-6):383-404. PubMed ID: 1484462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Informed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity.
    Elliott RL; Nelson E; Fitch WL; Scott R; Wolber G; Singh R
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 8148513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical research on the insanity defense and attempted reforms: evidence toward informed policy.
    Borum R; Fulero SM
    Law Hum Behav; 1999 Feb; 23(1):117-35. PubMed ID: 10100458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The psychiatrist's guide to right and wrong: Part IV: The insanity defense and the Ultimate Issue Rule.
    Goldstein RL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 2790225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding the use of the insanity defense.
    Blau GL; McGinley H; Pasewark R
    J Clin Psychol; 1993 May; 49(3):435-40. PubMed ID: 8315048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of motive information and crime unusualness on jurors' judgments in insanity cases.
    Pickel KL
    Law Hum Behav; 1998 Oct; 22(5):571-84. PubMed ID: 9833567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical research on the insanity defense and attempted reforms: evidence toward informed policy.
    Borum R; Fulero SM
    Law Hum Behav; 1999 Jun; 23(3):375-93. PubMed ID: 10439723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The insanity defence: from wild beasts to M'Naghten.
    Allnutt S; Samuels A; O'driscoll C
    Australas Psychiatry; 2007 Aug; 15(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 17612881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neuroimage evidence and the insanity defense.
    Schweitzer NJ; Saks MJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):592-607. PubMed ID: 21744379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Personality disorders and criminal responsibility: a second opinion.
    Rudnick A; Levy A
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1994; 17(4):409-20. PubMed ID: 7890474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mental state at time of offense in the hot tub: An empirical examination of concurrent expert testimony in an insanity case.
    Krauss DA; Gongola J; Scurich N; Busch B
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 May; 36(3):358-372. PubMed ID: 29691882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
    Poulson RL; Brondino MJ; Brown H; Braithwaite RL
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Expert assessment in legal liability--from the physician's viewpoint].
    Zeller G
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1992 Aug; 86(15-16):750-3; discussion 761-6. PubMed ID: 1441613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The volume and characteristics of insanity defense pleas: an eight-state study.
    Callahan LA; Steadman HJ; McGreevy MA; Robbins PC
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 1786413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The mental disability requirement in the insanity defense.
    Slovenko R
    Behav Sci Law; 1999; 17(2):165-80. PubMed ID: 10398328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus.
    Cobun LS
    Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):471-500. PubMed ID: 6486122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Medical expert assessment in psychiatry from the legal viewpoint].
    Schreiber HL
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):626-30; discussion 631. PubMed ID: 9064936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beyond competence and sanity: the influence of pretrial evaluation on case disposition.
    Warren JI; Rosenfeld B; Fitch WL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 7841509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Juror knowledge and attitudes regarding mental illness verdicts.
    Sloat LM; Frierson RL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 15985664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Basic principles of child and adolescent responsibility in penal law proceedings].
    Klosinski G
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2009 Nov; 151(45):37-8. PubMed ID: 19960721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.