These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

557 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1484462)

  • 21. Constructing insanity: jurors' prototypes, attitudes, and legal decision-making.
    Louden JE; Skeem JL
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):449-70. PubMed ID: 17506086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
    Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical assessment of the voluntariness of behavior.
    Halleck SL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(2):221-36. PubMed ID: 1633343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The multiple personality and the criminal law.
    Slovenko R
    Med Law; 1993; 12(3-5):329-40. PubMed ID: 8231703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Psychopathic disorders and criminal responsibility in the USA.
    Felthous AR
    Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 260 Suppl 2():S137-41. PubMed ID: 20936297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Disposition of insanity acquittees in the United States Military.
    Lande RG
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1990; 18(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 2245245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of female versus male insanity acquittees in Colorado.
    Seig A; Ball E; Menninger JA
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(4):523-32. PubMed ID: 8639980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Forensic psychiatry, its place and its promise.
    Bromberg W
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 8054668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Trial by jury; a pilot study of juror perception of mental health professional testimony in NGRI pleas for first degree international homicide.
    Palermo GB; Smith MB; Gram LC; Zier W; Kohler ME
    Med Law; 1996; 15(1):17-42. PubMed ID: 8691998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Thin slice expert testimony and mock trial deliberations.
    Parrott CT; Brodsky SL; Wilson JK
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():67-74. PubMed ID: 26346686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Automatism, medicine and the law.
    Fenwick P
    Psychol Med Monogr Suppl; 1990; 17():1-27. PubMed ID: 2192384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Suicide cases in civil law: do the legal tests make sense?
    McClung M
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1990; 18(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 2149661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Not guilty by reason of insanity: getting it right or perpetuating the myths?
    McCutcheon LE; McCutcheon LE
    Psychol Rep; 1994 Jun; 74(3 Pt 1):764-6. PubMed ID: 8058855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: a new standard for scientific evidence in the courts?
    Zonana H
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):309-25. PubMed ID: 7841504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dr Rogers' 'insanity detector' and the admissibility of novel scientific evidence.
    Goldstein RL
    Med Law; 1992; 11(5-6):441-7. PubMed ID: 1484466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Introduction to mental illness and criminal responsibility.
    Felthous AR
    Behav Sci Law; 1999; 17(2):143-6. PubMed ID: 10398326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The guilty but mentally ill verdict: a review and conceptual analysis of intent and impact.
    Palmer CA; Hazelrigg M
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 10774841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The R-CRAS and insanity evaluations: a re-examination of construct validity. Rogers Criminal Responsibility Assessment Scales.
    Rogers R; Sewell KW
    Behav Sci Law; 1999; 17(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 10398329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
    Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
    Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Mental state and the criminal responsibility--legal regulations and medical criteria in Poland and other countries].
    Bolechała F
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2009; 59(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 20860304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.