These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1484466)

  • 1. Dr Rogers' 'insanity detector' and the admissibility of novel scientific evidence.
    Goldstein RL
    Med Law; 1992; 11(5-6):441-7. PubMed ID: 1484466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The R-CRAS and insanity evaluations: a re-examination of construct validity. Rogers Criminal Responsibility Assessment Scales.
    Rogers R; Sewell KW
    Behav Sci Law; 1999; 17(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 10398329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Criminal offense, psychiatric diagnosis, and psycholegal opinion: an analysis of 894 pretrial referrals.
    Warren JI; Fitch WL; Dietz PE; Rosenfeld BD
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 2039849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding the use of the insanity defense.
    Blau GL; McGinley H; Pasewark R
    J Clin Psychol; 1993 May; 49(3):435-40. PubMed ID: 8315048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Development of modern classification systems and their effects on forensic psychiatric expert assessment].
    Krupinski M
    Gesundheitswesen; 1994 Dec; 56(12):652-6. PubMed ID: 7841673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Recent psychiatric classification systems and their significance for forensic psychiatry].
    Hoff P
    Gesundheitswesen; 1992 May; 54(5):244-50. PubMed ID: 1623309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: a new standard for scientific evidence in the courts?
    Zonana H
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):309-25. PubMed ID: 7841504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The mental disability requirement in the insanity defense.
    Slovenko R
    Behav Sci Law; 1999; 17(2):165-80. PubMed ID: 10398328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forensic psychiatrists' and psychologists' understanding of insanity: misguided expertise?
    Rogers R; Turner RE; Helfield R; Dickens S
    Can J Psychiatry; 1988 Nov; 33(8):691-5. PubMed ID: 3203269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Group dynamics in forensic pretrial decision-making.
    Pitt SE; Brandt JD; Tellefsen C; Janofsky JS; Cohen ME; Bettis ED; Rappeport JR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 9148886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forensic psychiatric expert witnessing within the criminal justice system in Germany.
    Konrad N; Völlm B
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 24268458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The reliability of expert assessment: comparative study of hospitalized or imprisoned patients following criminal behavior].
    Tron P; Loas G
    Ann Med Psychol (Paris); 1992 Dec; 150(10):741-5; discussion 745-6. PubMed ID: 1343504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
    Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
    Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of psychiatric diagnoses in the legal process: task force report of the American Psychiatric Association.
    Halleck SL; Hoge SK; Miller RD; Sadoff RL; Halleck NH
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(4):481-99. PubMed ID: 1482801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
    Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. False confessions, expert testimony, and admissibility.
    Watson C; Weiss KJ; Pouncey C
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(2):174-86. PubMed ID: 20542936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The insanity defence: from wild beasts to M'Naghten.
    Allnutt S; Samuels A; O'driscoll C
    Australas Psychiatry; 2007 Aug; 15(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 17612881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Psychological structure as a guiding principle in forensic practice].
    Janzarik W
    Nervenarzt; 1993 Jul; 64(7):427-33. PubMed ID: 8366970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using Technology to Improve the Objectivity of Criminal Responsibility Evaluations.
    Vitacco MJ; Gottfried ED; Batastini AB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 29618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.