These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1484975)

  • 1. Relative effectiveness of central, peripheral, and abrupt-onset cues in visual attention.
    Koshino H; Warner CB; Juola JF
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1992 Nov; 45(4):609-31. PubMed ID: 1484975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tradeoffs between attentional effects of spatial cues and abrupt onsets.
    Juola JF; Koshino H; Warner CB
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Apr; 57(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 7770324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic and voluntary control of attention in young and older adults.
    Juola JF; Koshino H; Warner CB; McMickell M; Peterson M
    Am J Psychol; 2000; 113(2):159-78. PubMed ID: 10862340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Voluntary allocation versus automatic capture of visual attention.
    Warner CB; Juola JF; Koshino H
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Sep; 48(3):243-51. PubMed ID: 2216651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
    Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation.
    Yantis S; Jonides J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Feb; 16(1):121-34. PubMed ID: 2137514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The time course of attentional capture under dual-task conditions.
    Santangelo V; Botta F; Lupiáñez J; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 21258904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do abrupt-onset peripheral cues attract attention automatically?
    Tepin MB; Dark VJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1992 Jul; 45(1):111-32. PubMed ID: 1636007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Orienting to counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues.
    Tipples J
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 18306962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does attention alter appearance?
    Schneider KA
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Jul; 68(5):800-14. PubMed ID: 17076348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Involuntary but not voluntary orienting contributes to a disengage deficit in visual neglect.
    Olk B; Hildebrandt H; Kingstone A
    Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1149-64. PubMed ID: 19733346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Onsets do not override top-down goals, but they are responded to more quickly.
    Wu SC; Remington RW; Folk CL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Apr; 76(3):649-54. PubMed ID: 24596080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Movement versus focusing of visual attention.
    Shepherd M; Müller HJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Aug; 46(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 2762102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eye gaze versus arrows as spatial cues: two qualitatively different modes of attentional selection.
    Marotta A; Lupiáñez J; Martella D; Casagrande M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):326-35. PubMed ID: 21688940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Timing of reflexive visuospatial orienting in young, young-old, and old-old adults.
    Langley LK; Friesen CK; Saville AL; Ciernia AT
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1546-61. PubMed ID: 21394555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings.
    Schreij D; Owens C; Theeuwes J
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):208-18. PubMed ID: 18372744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Look away! Eyes and arrows engage oculomotor responses automatically.
    Kuhn G; Kingstone A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):314-27. PubMed ID: 19304621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: the effect of visual onsets and offsets.
    Theeuwes J
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jan; 49(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 2011456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gaze and arrow distractors influence saccade trajectories similarly.
    Hermens F; Walker R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Nov; 63(11):2120-40. PubMed ID: 20486017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.