These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1485059)
1. Comparison of the proportions of affected relatives of cases and controls: analysis and minimum sample size formula. Commenges D; Letenneur L Stat Med; 1992 Sep; 11(13):1767-76. PubMed ID: 1485059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Approaches to familial aggregation: hypothesis testing and estimation when families are selected through parent probands under a variant of single ascertainment. Wickramaratne PJ Hum Hered; 2004; 57(4):179-90. PubMed ID: 15583423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the contribution family data can make to case-control studies of rare variants. Curtis D Ann Hum Genet; 2011 Sep; 75(5):630-8. PubMed ID: 21675965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Large sample tests for simultaneous comparison to multiple controls in terms of binomial proportions. Soulakova JN; Luo L J Biopharm Stat; 2013 May; 23(3):589-603. PubMed ID: 23611197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Score test for familial aggregation in probands studies: application to Alzheimer's disease. Commenges D; Jacqmin H; Letenneur L; Van Duijn CM Biometrics; 1995 Jun; 51(2):542-51. PubMed ID: 7662843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increased risk of incident pancreatic cancer among first-degree relatives of patients with familial pancreatic cancer. Tersmette AC; Petersen GM; Offerhaus GJ; Falatko FC; Brune KA; Goggins M; Rozenblum E; Wilentz RE; Yeo CJ; Cameron JL; Kern SE; Hruban RH Clin Cancer Res; 2001 Mar; 7(3):738-44. PubMed ID: 11297271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Polygenic inheritance of breast cancer: Implications for design of association studies. Antoniou AC; Easton DF Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Nov; 25(3):190-202. PubMed ID: 14557987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Familial aggregation in constipated subjects in a tertiary referral center. Chan AO; Hui WM; Lam KF; Leung G; Yuen MF; Lam SK; Wong BC Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Jan; 102(1):149-52. PubMed ID: 17037990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A simple approximation for calculating sample sizes for comparing independent proportions. Fleiss JL; Tytun A; Ury HK Biometrics; 1980 Jun; 36(2):343-6. PubMed ID: 26625475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A myriad of methods: calculated sample size for two proportions was dependent on the choice of sample size formula and software. Bell ML; Teixeira-Pinto A; McKenzie JE; Olivier J J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 May; 67(5):601-5. PubMed ID: 24439070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sample size and optimal design for logistic regression with binary interaction. Demidenko E Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 17634969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate. Piver MS Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Overlap between treatment and control distributions as an effect size measure in experiments. Hedges LV; Olkin I Psychol Methods; 2016 Mar; 21(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 26523436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimal sizes of cases with a susceptible genotype and minimal odds ratios among susceptible individuals in case-control studies. Hamajima N; Mutoh H; Eguchi H; Honda H Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2005; 6(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 16101327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk for smoking-related cancer among relatives of lung cancer patients. Etzel CJ; Amos CI; Spitz MR Cancer Res; 2003 Dec; 63(23):8531-5. PubMed ID: 14679021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]