These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1485404)

  • 1. Subcutaneous tissue reaction to polyethylene terephtalate-covered electronic identification transponders in pigs.
    Lambooij E; de Groot PH; Molenbeek RF; Gruys E
    Vet Q; 1992 Dec; 14(4):145-7. PubMed ID: 1485404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of injecting electronic transponders into the auricle of pigs.
    Lammers GH; Langeveld NG; Lambooij E; Gruys E
    Vet Rec; 1995 Jun; 136(24):606-9. PubMed ID: 7571264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biocompatibility of glass-encapsulated electronic chips (transponders) used for the identification of pigs.
    Gruys E; Schakenraad JM; Kruit LK; Bolscher JM
    Vet Rec; 1993 Oct; 133(16):385-8. PubMed ID: 8310604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electronic identification with injectable transponders in pig production: results of a field trail on commercial farms and slaughterhouses concerning injectability and retrievability.
    Lambooij E; Langeveld NG; Lammers GH; Huiskes JH
    Vet Q; 1995 Dec; 17(4):118-23. PubMed ID: 8751271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Implantation of transponders at the bottom of the ear in equines].
    Mader Ch; Geisel O; Gerhards H; Hermanns W
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2002; 115(5-6):161-6. PubMed ID: 12058588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal implantation site of transponders for identification of experimental swine.
    Nakamura S; Sakaoka A; Ikuno E; Asou R; Shimizu D; Hagiwara H
    Exp Anim; 2019 Feb; 68(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 30078789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of ear tags and injectable transponders for the identification and traceability of pigs from birth to the end of the slaughter line.
    Caja G; Hernández-Jover M; Conill C; Garín D; Alabern X; Farriol B; Ghirardi J
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Sep; 83(9):2215-24. PubMed ID: 16100077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of visual and electronic identification devices in pigs: slaughterhouse performance.
    Santamarina C; Hernández-Jover M; Babot D; Caja G
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Feb; 85(2):497-502. PubMed ID: 17235033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subcutaneous electronic identification in cattle: a field study.
    Løken T; Vatn G; Kummen E
    Vet Rec; 2011 Sep; 169(10):250. PubMed ID: 21813580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Traceability of extensively produced Iberian pigs using visual and electronic identification devices from farm to slaughter.
    Gosálvez LF; Santamarina C; Averós X; Hernández-Jover M; Caja G; Babot D
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2746-52. PubMed ID: 17609464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Readability and histological biocompatibility of microchip transponders in horses.
    Wulf M; Wohlsein P; Aurich JE; Nees M; Baumgärtner W; Aurich C
    Vet J; 2013 Oct; 198(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 23769456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of passive injectable transponders in fattening lambs from birth to slaughter: effects of injection position, age, and breed.
    Conill C; Caja G; Nehring R; Ribó O
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Apr; 80(4):919-25. PubMed ID: 12002329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of visual and electronic identification devices in pigs: on-farm performances.
    Babot D; Hernández-Jover M; Caja G; Santamarina C; Ghirardi JJ
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Sep; 84(9):2575-81. PubMed ID: 16908663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Connective tissue of capsules surrounding lavsan under conditions of long-term implantation].
    Daurova TT; Dekhtiareva SM
    Biull Eksp Biol Med; 1977 Sep; 84(9):366-8. PubMed ID: 143971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neoplasia and granulomas surrounding microchip transponders in Damaraland mole rats (Cryptomys damarensis).
    Sura R; French RA; Goldman BD; Schwartz DR
    Vet Pathol; 2011 Jul; 48(4):896-902. PubMed ID: 20724516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of sites for implanting identification transponders in cattle.
    Hasker PJ; Bassingthwaighte J; Round PJ
    Aust Vet J; 1992 Apr; 69(4):91. PubMed ID: 1605792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biological and migrational characteristics of transponders implanted into beagle dogs.
    Jansen JA; van der Waerden JP; Gwalter RH; van Rooy SA
    Vet Rec; 1999 Sep; 145(12):329-33. PubMed ID: 10530881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microgrooved subcutaneous implants in the goat.
    Walboomers XF; Croes HJ; Ginsel LA; Jansen JA
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1998 Dec; 42(4):634-41. PubMed ID: 9827689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental evaluation of local reactions due to Dacron used in Tenckhoff catheters for peritoneal dialysis.
    Lansdown AB; Sirivongs D; Vuttivirojana A
    ASAIO J; 1995; 41(2):202-4. PubMed ID: 7640428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tissue reaction to an implantable identification device in mice.
    Rao GN; Edmondson J
    Toxicol Pathol; 1990; 18(3):412-6. PubMed ID: 2267501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.