155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1485642)
1. Measurement of subcutaneous adipose tissue using ultrasound images.
Ramirez ME
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1992 Nov; 89(3):347-57. PubMed ID: 1485642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of subcutaneous fat measurement: comparison of skinfold calipers, ultrasound, and computed tomography.
Orphanidou C; McCargar L; Birmingham CL; Mathieson J; Goldner E
J Am Diet Assoc; 1994 Aug; 94(8):855-8. PubMed ID: 8046177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing subcutaneous adipose tissue by simple and portable field instruments: Skinfolds versus A-mode ultrasound measurements.
Pérez-Chirinos Buxadé C; Solà-Perez T; Castizo-Olier J; Carrasco-Marginet M; Roy A; Marfell-Jones M; Irurtia A
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0205226. PubMed ID: 30496211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of B-mode ultrasonic measurements of subcutaneous adipose tissue and intra-abdominal depth: comparisons with skinfold thicknesses.
Bellisari A; Roche AF; Siervogel RM
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1993 Aug; 17(8):475-80. PubMed ID: 8401751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of ultrasound and skinfold caliper measurement of subcutaneous fat tissue.
Weits T; van der Beek EJ; Wedel M
Int J Obes; 1986; 10(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 3531051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Body composition in sport: a comparison of a novel ultrasound imaging technique to measure subcutaneous fat tissue compared with skinfold measurement.
Müller W; Horn M; Fürhapter-Rieger A; Kainz P; Kröpfl JM; Maughan RJ; Ahammer H
Br J Sports Med; 2013 Nov; 47(16):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24055780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of near infra-red interactance for assessment of subcutaneous and total body fat.
Brooke-Wavell K; Jones PR; Norgan NG; Hardman AE
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1995 Jan; 49(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 7713052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of ultrasound and skinfold measurements in assessment of subcutaneous and total fatness.
Borkan GA; Hults DE; Cardarelli J; Burrows BA
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1982 Jul; 58(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 7124924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Compressibility of skinfolds and the measurement of subcutaneous fatness.
Himes JH; Roche AF; Siervogel RM
Am J Clin Nutr; 1979 Aug; 32(8):1734-40. PubMed ID: 463811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimation of body fat from ultrasound measures of subcutaneous fat and circumferences in obese women.
Fanelli MT; Kuczmarski RJ; Hirsch M
Int J Obes; 1988; 12(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 3290131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of four techniques for measuring central adiposity in postpartum adolescents.
Stevens-Simon C; Thureen P; Stamm E; Scherzinger A
J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Jun; 10(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 11444792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Familial aggregation of subcutaneous fat deposits and the peripheral fat distribution pattern.
Ramirez ME
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1993 Feb; 17(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 8384166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skinfold caliper and ultrasound assessments of change in the distribution of subcutaneous fat during adolescent pregnancy.
Stevens-Simon C; Thureen P; Barrett J; Stamm E
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Sep; 25(9):1340-5. PubMed ID: 11571597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Correlation between skinfold thickness and ultrasonography in the study of subcutaneous adipose tissue in females].
Cataldo MG; Brancato D; Brancato G; Verga S; Buscemi S; Licata G
Ann Ital Med Int; 1997; 12(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 9409947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation in community surveys of total body fat of children using bioelectrical impedance or skinfold thickness measurements.
Hammond J; Rona RJ; Chinn S
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1994 Mar; 48(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 8194501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity and reliability of an ultrasound system for estimating adipose tissue.
Loenneke JP; Barnes JT; Wagganer JD; Wilson JM; Lowery RP; Green CE; Pujol TJ
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2014 Mar; 34(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 23879395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gender differences in fat patterning in children living in Ankara.
Gültekin T; Akin G; Ozer BK
Anthropol Anz; 2005 Dec; 63(4):427-37. PubMed ID: 16402593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cadaver studies and their impact on the understanding of human adiposity.
Clarys JP; Provyn S; Marfell-Jones MJ
Ergonomics; 2005 Sep 15-Nov 15; 48(11-14):1445-61. PubMed ID: 16338712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gender differences in body fat of low- and high-body-mass children: relationship with body mass index.
Komiya S; Eto C; Otoki K; Teramoto K; Shimizu F; Shimamoto H
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2000 May; 82(1-2):16-23. PubMed ID: 10879438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of nutritional status in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: whole-body bioimpedance vs body mass index, skinfolds, and leg-to-leg bioimpedance.
Hollander FM; De Roos NM; De Vries JH; Van Berkhout FT
J Am Diet Assoc; 2005 Apr; 105(4):549-55. PubMed ID: 15800555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
