BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1485643)

  • 1. Falsification of a single species hypothesis using the coefficient of variation: a simulation approach.
    Cope DA; Lacy MG
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1992 Nov; 89(3):359-78. PubMed ID: 1485643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A simulation test of hominoid species number at Lufeng, China: implications for the use of the coefficient of variation in paleotaxonomy.
    Kelley J; Plavcan JM
    J Hum Evol; 1998 Dec; 35(6):577-96. PubMed ID: 9929170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metric variation and sexual dimorphism in the dentition of Ouranopithecus macedoniensis.
    Schrein CM
    J Hum Evol; 2006 Apr; 50(4):460-8. PubMed ID: 16413596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metric and non-metric randomization methods, geographic variation, and the single-species hypothesis for Asian and African Homo erectus.
    Villmoare B
    J Hum Evol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):680-701. PubMed ID: 16202442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metric variation in the postcanine teeth from Paşalar, Turkey.
    Humphrey LT; Andrews P
    J Hum Evol; 2008 Apr; 54(4):503-17. PubMed ID: 18022672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing for multiple species in fossil samples: an evaluation and comparison of tests for equal relative variation.
    Donnelly SM; Kramer A
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1999 Apr; 108(4):507-29. PubMed ID: 10229391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variation and diversity in Homo erectus: a 3D geometric morphometric analysis of the temporal bone.
    Terhune CE; Kimbel WH; Lockwood CA
    J Hum Evol; 2007 Jul; 53(1):41-60. PubMed ID: 17512034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human taxonomic diversity in the pleistocene: does Homo erectus represent multiple hominid species?
    Kramer A
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1993 Jun; 91(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 8317558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patterns of tooth crown size and shape variation in great apes and humans and species recognition in the hominid fossil record.
    Scott JE; Lockwood CA
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2004 Dec; 125(4):303-19. PubMed ID: 15386248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing the taxonomic integrity of Paranthropus boisei sensu stricto.
    Silverman N; Richmond B; Wood B
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2001 Jun; 115(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 11385603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual dimorphism in canine shape among extant great apes.
    Kelley J
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1995 Apr; 96(4):365-89. PubMed ID: 7604892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beyond Gorilla and Pongo: alternative models for evaluating variation and sexual dimorphism in fossil hominoid samples.
    Scott JE; Schrein CM; Kelley J
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2009 Oct; 140(2):253-64. PubMed ID: 19358294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brief communication: Is variation in the cranial capacity of the Dmanisi sample too high to be from a single species?
    Lee SH
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2005 Jul; 127(3):263-6. PubMed ID: 15503340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can enamel microstructure be used to establish the presence of different species of Plio-Pleistocene hominids from Omo, Ethiopia?
    Ramirez Rozzi F
    J Hum Evol; 1998; 35(4-5):543-76. PubMed ID: 9774510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Another look at shape variation in the distal femur of Australopithecus afarensis: implications for taxonomic and functional diversity at Hadar.
    Lague MR
    J Hum Evol; 2002 May; 42(5):609-26. PubMed ID: 11969299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does brain size variability provide evidence of multiple species in Homo habilis?
    Miller JA
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1991 Apr; 84(4):385-98. PubMed ID: 2053613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing the accuracy and precision of three techniques used for estimating missing landmarks when reconstructing fossil hominin crania.
    Neeser R; Ackermann RR; Gain J
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2009 Sep; 140(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 19208416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing fluctuating odontometric asymmetry among fossil hominin taxa through alternative measures of central tendency: effect of outliers and directional components on reported results.
    Kegley AD; Hemingway J
    Homo; 2007; 58(1):33-52. PubMed ID: 17254582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dental metric comparisons of Morotopithecus and Afropithecus: implications for the validity of the genus Morotopithecus.
    Patel BA; Grossman A
    J Hum Evol; 2006 Nov; 51(5):506-12. PubMed ID: 16914180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating sexual dimorphism and size differences in the fossil record: a test of methods.
    Rehg JA; Leigh SR
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1999 Sep; 110(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 10490471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.