65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1486177)
1. Management of women with a cervical smear showing a mild degree of dyskaryosis: a review of policy.
Cooper P; Kirby AJ; Spiegelhalter DJ; Whitehead AL; Patterson A
Cytopathology; 1992; 3(6):331-9. PubMed ID: 1486177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcome analysis of 4 years' follow-up of patients referred for colposcopy with one smear showing mild dyskaryosis.
Ahmed AS; Goumalatsos G; Akbar N; Lawton FG; Savvas M
Cytopathology; 2008 Apr; 19(2):94-105. PubMed ID: 17937774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Management of women with mild and moderate cervical dyskaryosis.
Flannelly G; Anderson D; Kitchener HC; Mann EM; Campbell M; Fisher P; Walker F; Templeton AA
BMJ; 1994 May; 308(6941):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8019248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Four and a half year follow up of women with dyskaryotic cervical smears.
Fletcher A; Metaxas N; Grubb C; Chamberlain J
BMJ; 1990 Sep; 301(6753):641-4. PubMed ID: 2224218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determinants of high-grade dysplasia among women with mild dyskaryosis on cervical smear.
Parazzini F; Sideri M; Restelli S; Schettino F; Chatenoud L; Crosignani PG
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov; 86(5):754-7. PubMed ID: 7566843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk of cervical cancer associated with mild dyskaryosis.
Robertson JH; Woodend BE; Crozier EH; Hutchinson J
BMJ; 1988 Jul; 297(6640):18-21. PubMed ID: 3408902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cytological status and lesion size: a further dimension in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Jarmulowicz MR; Jenkins D; Barton SE; Goodall AL; Hollingworth A; Singer A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Sep; 96(9):1061-6. PubMed ID: 2804008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The cytological prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in colposcopically directed biopsies.
Parham DM; Wiredu EK; Hussein KA
Cytopathology; 1991; 2(6):285-90. PubMed ID: 1801949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mild cervical dyskaryosis: safety of cytological surveillance.
Jones MH; Jenkins D; Cuzick J; Wolfendale MR; Jones JJ; Balogun-Lynch C; Usherwood MM; Singer A
Lancet; 1992 Jun; 339(8807):1440-3. PubMed ID: 1351129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long term follow up of women with borderline cervical smear test results: effects of age and viral infection on progression to high grade dyskaryosis.
Hirschowitz L; Raffle AE; Mackenzie EF; Hughes AO
BMJ; 1992 May; 304(6836):1209-12. PubMed ID: 1325232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Cardiff Cervical Cytology Study: prevalence of cytological grades and initial histological findings.
Evans DM; Hibbard BM; Jones JM; Sweetnam P
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1981 Feb; 282(6265):689-91. PubMed ID: 6781617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CIN 3: the role of lesion size in invasion.
Tidbury P; Singer A; Jenkins D
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Jul; 99(7):583-6. PubMed ID: 1525100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: treatment patterns and associated costs in England and Wales.
Martin-Hirsch P; Rash B; Martin A; Standaert B
BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 17378815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does mild atypia on a cervical smear warrant further investigation?
Walker EM; Dodgson J; Duncan ID
Lancet; 1986 Sep; 2(8508):672-3. PubMed ID: 2876144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Follow-up Papanicolaou smear for cervical atypia: are we missing significant disease? A HARNET Study.
Slawson DC; Bennett JH; Herman JM
J Fam Pract; 1993 Mar; 36(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 8454975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abnormal cervical cytology following large loop excision of the transformation zone: a case controlled study.
Shafi MI; Dunn JA; Buxton EJ; Finn CB; Jordan JA; Luesley DM
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Feb; 100(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 8476806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The cytological detection of persistent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after local ablative treatment: a comparison of sampling devices.
Hughes RG; Haddad NG; Smart GE; Colquhoun M; McGoogan E; MacIntyre CC; Prescott RJ
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Jun; 99(6):498-502. PubMed ID: 1637767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mild and moderate dyskaryosis: can women be selected for colposcopy on the basis of social criteria?
Anderson DJ; Flannelly GM; Kitchener HC; Fisher PM; Mann EM; Campbell MK; Templeton A
BMJ; 1992 Jul; 305(6845):84-7. PubMed ID: 1638252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical screening in women over the age of 50: results of a population-based multicentre study.
Flannelly G; Monaghan J; Cruickshank M; Duncan I; Johnson J; Jordan J; Campbell M; Patnick J
BJOG; 2004 Apr; 111(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 15008774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
