These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1486204)

  • 1. High-frequency thresholds: circumaural earphone versus insert earphone.
    Valente M; Valente M; Goebel J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Nov; 3(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 1486204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How does the sound pressure generated by circumaural, supra-aural, and insert earphones differ for adult and infant ears?
    Voss SE; Herrmann BS
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):636-50. PubMed ID: 16377999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of inter-aural attenuation with the Etymotic ER-3A insert earphone and the Telephonics TDH-39 supra-aural earphone.
    Munro KJ; Agnew N
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 10509860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.
    Beahan N; Kei J; Driscoll C; Charles B; Khan A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 21760512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Two Circumaural Earphones for Audiometry.
    Smull CC; Madsen B; Margolis RH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):177-183. PubMed ID: 29742546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test-retest variability in audiometric threshold with supraaural and insert earphones among children and adults.
    Stuart A; Stenstrom R; Tompkins C; Vandenhoff S
    Audiology; 1991; 30(2):82-90. PubMed ID: 1877901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-frequency (8 to 16 kHz) reference thresholds and intrasubject threshold variability relative to ototoxicity criteria using a Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone.
    Frank T
    Ear Hear; 2001 Apr; 22(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 11324845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of insert earphones for high-frequency bedside ototoxicity monitoring.
    Gordon JS; Phillips DS; Helt WJ; Konrad-Martin D; Fausti SA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 16187247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The equivalent threshold sound pressure levels and test-retest threshold variability of a consumer-grade insert earphone fitted with stock, foam, and otoacoustic emission probe ear tips.
    Seluakumaran K; Kamal Azizi A; Kulasegarah J
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Jul; 63(7):551-559. PubMed ID: 37139683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the variability in thresholds measured with insert and conventional supra-aural earphones.
    Lindgren F
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 2336535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Middle ear pathology can affect the ear-canal sound pressure generated by audiologic earphones.
    Voss SE; Rosowski JJ; Merchant SN; Thornton AR; Shera CA; Peake WT
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 10981602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AMTAS(®): automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: III. sensorineural hearing loss and air-bone gaps.
    Margolis RH; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):440-7. PubMed ID: 21668325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Normal hearing threshold levels in the low-frequency range determined by an insert earphone.
    Arlinger SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Nov; 90(5):2411-4. PubMed ID: 1774411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of audiometric thresholds obtained with insert earphones when used by certified audiometric technicians.
    Bell-Lehmkuhler B; Meinke DK; Sedey A; Tuell C
    Noise Health; 2009; 11(42):59-68. PubMed ID: 19265255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A version of the TEN Test for use with ER-3A insert earphones.
    Moore BC; Creeke S; Glasberg BR; Stone MA; Sek A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):554-7. PubMed ID: 22436409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-frequency thresholds: sound suite versus hospital room.
    Valente M; Potts LG; Valente M; French-St George M; Goebel J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Jul; 3(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 1421462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ambient Noise Monitoring during Pure-Tone Audiometry.
    Margolis RH; Saly GL; Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 35817024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical use of an insert earphone.
    Clemis JD; Ballad WJ; Killion MC
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1986; 95(5 Pt 1):520-4. PubMed ID: 3767222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of the type of acoustic transducer in pure-tone audiometry.
    Born NM; Marciano MDS; Mass SDC; Silva DPCD; Scharlach RC
    Codas; 2022; 34(3):e20210019. PubMed ID: 35019084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.