These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1486368)

  • 1. Improved image quality for dense breasts in mammography.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Jan; 65(769):50-5. PubMed ID: 1486368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammography with synchrotron radiation: phase-detection techniques.
    Arfelli F; Bonvicini V; Bravin A; Cantatore G; Castelli E; Palma LD; Michiel MD; Fabrizioli M; Longo R; Menk RH; Olivo A; Pani S; Pontoni D; Poropat P; Prest M; Rashevsky A; Ratti M; Rigon L; Tromba G; Vacchi A; Vallazza E; Zanconati F
    Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):286-93. PubMed ID: 10751500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A comparison between traditional mammography and digital with storage phosphors].
    Lambruschi G; Tagliagambe A; Palla L; Torri T; D'Alessandro F; Pastori R; Barbieri L
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):59-64. PubMed ID: 8480050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Large breasts, small breasts; which mammographic technic?].
    Hessler C; Depeursinge C; Grecescu M; Raimondi S; Valley JF
    J Radiol; 1986 Feb; 67(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 3712313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
    Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance tests for mammographic film-screen combinations: use of absolute techniques.
    Bor D; Akdur K
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2013; 19(5):360-70. PubMed ID: 23603122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-contrast mammography with a moving grid: assessment of clinical utility.
    Sickles EA; Weber WN
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jun; 146(6):1137-9. PubMed ID: 3518365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of processing conditions on mammographic image quality.
    Braeuning MP; Cooper HW; O'Brien S; Burns CB; Washburn DB; Schell MJ; Pisano ED
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Aug; 6(8):464-70. PubMed ID: 10480042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
    Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Role of equalisation mammography of dense breasts.
    Plewes DB; Sabol JM; Soutar I; Chevrier A; Shumak R
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1995 Mar; 33(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 7643655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reference levels for image quality in mammography.
    Zdesar U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):170-2. PubMed ID: 18375465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Image quality and optical density in mammography: study on phantoms].
    Stinés J; Noël A; Estivalet S; Troufléau P; Netter E; Quinquis J
    J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 79(4):331-5. PubMed ID: 9757259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of automatic kV selection on dose and contrast for a mammographic X-ray system.
    Young KC; Ramsdale ML; Rust A; Cooke J
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Oct; 70(838):1036-42. PubMed ID: 9404208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnification film mammography: image quality and clinical studies.
    Sickles EA; Doi K; Genant HK
    Radiology; 1977 Oct; 125(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 897191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practical application of a scan-rotate equalization geometry to mammography.
    Sabol JM; Soutar IC; Plewes DB
    Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1987-96. PubMed ID: 8994163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Observer performance and dose efficiency of mammographic scanning equalization radiography.
    Sabol JM; Soutar IC; Plewes DB
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(5):1517-25. PubMed ID: 8289736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation of mean glandular dose versus compressed breast thickness relationship for mammography.
    Bor D; Tukel S; Olgar T; Toklu T; Aydin E; Akyol O
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):160-4. PubMed ID: 18420560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance measurements of mammographic systems.
    Bor D; Akyol O; Olgar T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):165-9. PubMed ID: 18448439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Absorbed breast dose: dependence on radiographic modality and technique, and breast thickness.
    Skubic SE; Fatouros PP
    Radiology; 1986 Oct; 161(1):263-70. PubMed ID: 3763877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.