These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Characterization and simulation of impaired hearing: implications for hearing aid design. Moore BC Ear Hear; 1991 Dec; 12(6 Suppl):154S-161S. PubMed ID: 1794642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nasalance measurements in hearing-impaired children. Tatchell JA; Stewart M; Lapine PR J Commun Disord; 1991 Aug; 24(4):275-85. PubMed ID: 1838747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In-the-ear hearing aids. The use and benefit in the elderly hearing-impaired. Henrichsen J; Noring E; Christensen B; Pedersen F; Parving A Scand Audiol; 1988; 17(4):209-12. PubMed ID: 3232021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reported benefits and problems experienced with bone-anchored hearing aids. Stephens D; Board T; Hobson J; Cooper H Br J Audiol; 1996 Jun; 30(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 8818248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intelligibility of telephone speech for the hearing impaired when various microphones are used for acoustic coupling. Janota CP; Janota JO J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Feb; 34(1):183-8. PubMed ID: 2008072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Telecommunication performance of persons with hearing handicap in relation to speech reception threshold. Nielsen HB; Gilberg I Scand Audiol; 1978; 7(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 158826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use and benefit of in-the-ear hearing aids. A four-year follow-up examination. Henrichsen J; Noring E; Lindemann L; Christensen B; Parving A Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 1842270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hearing aid gain for loudness-density normalization in cochlear hearing losses with impaired frequency resolution. Leijon A Ear Hear; 1991 Aug; 12(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 1783226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictability and reliability of hearing aid benefit measured using the PHAB. Cox RM; Rivera IM J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Jul; 3(4):242-54. PubMed ID: 1421456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Problems of the hearing impaired in Poland. Golabek W; Nowakowska M; Siwiec H; Stephens SD Br J Audiol; 1989 Feb; 23(1):73-5. PubMed ID: 2706411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of microphone location in ITE versus BTE hearing aids. Gartrell EL; Church GT J Am Acad Audiol; 1990 Jul; 1(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 2132598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance characteristics for hearing aid microphone versus telephone and telephone/telecoil reception modes. Tannahill JC J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Jun; 26(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 6887805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss. Moore BC; Johnson JS; Clark TM; Pluvinage V Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):349-70. PubMed ID: 1487095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In-the-ear and behind-the-ear hearing aids in the elderly. Meredith R; Stephens D Scand Audiol; 1993; 22(4):211-6. PubMed ID: 8146584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the efficacy of a multimemory hearing aid. Kuk FK J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Sep; 3(5):338-48. PubMed ID: 1421470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]