These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1487092)

  • 21. Comparison of hearing aids over the 20th century.
    Bentler RA; Duve MR
    Ear Hear; 2000 Dec; 21(6):625-39. PubMed ID: 11132788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of hearing aids with amplitude compression.
    Nábĕlek IV; Robinette LN
    Audiology; 1977; 16(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 836256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. First audiometric results with the Vibrant soundbridge, a semi-implantable hearing device for sensorineural hearing loss.
    Snik AF; Cremers CW
    Audiology; 1999; 38(6):335-8. PubMed ID: 10582535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of compression ratio in a slow-acting compression hearing aid: paired-comparison judgments of quality.
    Neuman AC; Bakke MH; Hellman S; Levitt H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Sep; 96(3):1471-8. PubMed ID: 7963011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of linear gain and wide dynamic range compression hearing aid circuits II: aided loudness measures.
    Jenstad LM; Pumford J; Seewald RC; Cornelisse LE
    Ear Hear; 2000 Feb; 21(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 10708072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Double blind comparison of three hearing aid circuits with new hearing aid users.
    Hayes DE; Cormier KL
    Scand Audiol; 2000; 29(1):10-9. PubMed ID: 10718672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of two digitally programmable hearing aids.
    Ricketts TA; Bentler RA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Mar; 3(2):101-12. PubMed ID: 1600212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Client preferences for compression threshold in single-channel wide dynamic range compression hearing aids.
    Barker C; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 1999 Apr; 20(2):127-39. PubMed ID: 10229514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of multichannel digital signal processing on loudness comfort, sentence recognition, and sound quality.
    Mispagel KM; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006; 17(10):681-707. PubMed ID: 17153718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of hearing aid fittings using insertion gain measurements.
    Ringdahl A; Leijon A; Lidén G
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 6494804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Speech recognition performance at loudness discomfort level.
    Dirks DD; Kamm CA; Dubno JR; Velde TM
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 7323674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Physiological assessment of contrast-enhancing frequency shaping and multiband compression in hearing aids.
    Bruce IC
    Physiol Meas; 2004 Aug; 25(4):945-56. PubMed ID: 15382833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Selecting different amplification for different listening conditions.
    Keidser G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1996 Apr; 7(2):92-104. PubMed ID: 8652874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ability to achieve gain/frequency response and SSPL-90 under three prescription formulas with in-the-ear hearing aids.
    Sammeth CA; Peek BF; Bratt GW; Bess FH; Amberg SM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Jan; 4(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 8422481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Loudness growth functions between children with normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss by the modified Contour test].
    Zhou W; Chen XH; Wu X
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 43(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 18630279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hearing loss and powerful unlimited hearing aids.
    Sorri M; Peltomäki E; Karma P
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (Suppl 8):227-31. PubMed ID: 299110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Frequency shaping and multiband compression in hearing aids.
    Abramovitz RS
    J Commun Disord; 1980 Dec; 13(6):483-8. PubMed ID: 7451675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Nonlinear digital hearing aid with near-instantaneous amplitude compression.
    Kaneko K; Shoji K; Kojima H; Inoue M; Asato R; Hirano S; Tateya I
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2001 Dec; 258(10):523-8. PubMed ID: 11829189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fitting multichannel-compression hearing aids.
    Dreschler WA
    Audiology; 1992; 31(3):121-31. PubMed ID: 1642563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Syllabic compression: effective compression ratios for signals modulated at different rates.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    Br J Audiol; 1992 Dec; 26(6):351-61. PubMed ID: 1292819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.