251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1487093)
1. A comparison of sound quality judgments for monaural and binaural hearing aid processed stimuli.
Balfour PB; Hawkins DB
Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):331-9. PubMed ID: 1487093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monaural/binaural preferences: effect of hearing aid circuit on speech intelligibility and sound quality.
Naidoo SV; Hawkins DB
J Am Acad Audiol; 1997 Jun; 8(3):188-202. PubMed ID: 9188076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
Narendran MM; Humes LE
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
Moore BC; Sęk A
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Musician and Nonmusician Hearing Aid Setting Preferences for Music and Speech Stimuli.
D'Onofrio KL; Gifford RH; Ricketts TA
Am J Audiol; 2019 Jun; 28(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 31091118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are two ears not better than one?
McArdle RA; Killion M; Mennite MA; Chisolm TH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Mar; 23(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 22436115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of head angle on monaural and binaural performance with directional and omnidirectional hearing aids.
Ricketts T
Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 10981608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Binaural application of the bone-anchored hearing aid.
Snik AF; Beynon AJ; Mylanus EA; van der Pouw CT; Cremers CW
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1998 Mar; 107(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 9525238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binaural loudness summation in the hearing impaired.
Hawkins DB; Prosek RA; Walden BE; Montgomery AA
J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Mar; 30(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 3560897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
Johnson EE
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of Modified Hearing Aid Fittings on Loudness and Tone Quality for Different Acoustic Scenes.
Moore BC; Baer T; Ives DT; Marriage J; Salorio-Corbetto M
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 26928003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech and music quality ratings for linear and nonlinear hearing aid circuitry.
Davies-Venn E; Souza P; Fabry D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Sep; 18(8):688-99. PubMed ID: 18326155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceived Sound Quality of Hearing Aids With Varying Placements of Microphone and Receiver.
Stone MA; Lough M; Kühnel V; Biggins AE; Whiston H; Dillon H
Am J Audiol; 2023 Mar; 32(1):135-149. PubMed ID: 36580494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptual consequences of different signal changes due to binaural noise reduction: do hearing loss and working memory capacity play a role?
Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e213-27. PubMed ID: 25010636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between two measures of aided binaural advantage.
Cox RM; Bisset JD
J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 Nov; 49(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 6503246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Effect of a High Upper Input Limiting Level on Word Recognition in Noise, Sound Quality Preferences, and Subjective Ratings of Real-World Performance.
Oeding K; Valente M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):547-62. PubMed ID: 26134722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
